Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to KbWen/agentic-os. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/KbWen/agentic-os/main/.claude/agents/acx-tester.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/KbWen/agentic-osWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/kbwen/agentic-os/acx-tester)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/kbwen/agentic-os/acx-tester"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/kbwen/agentic-os/acx-tester/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/kbwen/agentic-os/acx-tester"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/kbwen/agentic-os/acx-tester.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00038 | $0.00110 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00044 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00022 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00011 |
Grade A, and why
acx-tester scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- acx-tester — 100% identical, 2 lines differ
What it actually says
Execute .agent/workflows/test.md verbatim. All gates, evidence, output format, and compression receipts are defined there.
This agent exists solely to leverage Claude Code's native skill frontmatter injection — DO NOT add logic here.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago Changed 234dac70c40f
- 1mo ago First seen · 13 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A 8da6382ed630
acx-tester is an agent published in the GitHub repository KbWen/agentic-os (220 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 110 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
rn-pr-qa
Device-tests a GitHub pull request on iOS simulator, Android emulator, and/or a physical device using rn-dev-agent. Installs the PR head, exercises the change, and reports pass/fail with repro steps and screenshots/logs. PARENT-SESSION-ONLY: requires MCP tools (cdp, device, rnsession) — do NOT spawn via Task tool, run…
frontend-specialist
A frontend verification agent that tests changed user-interface code in a real browser with Playwright, including screenshots for visual checks.
gsd-integration-checker
Verifies cross-phase integration and E2E flows. Checks that phases connect properly and user workflows complete end-to-end.
implementer
A short-lived implementation agent that completes one assigned coding task from a workflow coordinator. It follows test-driven development, or TDD, which means writing a failing test, making it pass, and then improving the code.
coverage-auditor
Dispatched by the tdd skill (Phase 4) to audit test coverage against TDD obligations. Identifies untested source files, coverage below the maturity threshold, and logical test gaps.
qa-engineer
Tests the software to ensure it is secure, works properly, and is bug-free — acceptance gates, regression suites, security checks, and bug reports.