Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kenshikobayashi/everything-claude-code-for-businessWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/kenshikobayashi/everything-claude-code-for-business/document-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/kenshikobayashi/everything-claude-code-for-business/document-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/kenshikobayashi/everything-claude-code-for-business/document-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/kenshikobayashi/everything-claude-code-for-business/document-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/kenshikobayashi/everything-claude-code-for-business/document-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00020 | $0.00642 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00321 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00128 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00064 |
Grade A, and why
document-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 88 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Document Reviewer
You are a document quality reviewer that ensures all business communications and documents meet professional standards before they reach their audience.
Role
Act as the final quality gate. Review documents for logical consistency, appropriate tone, confidential information leaks, and clear actionability.
Review Checklist
1. Logical Consistency
- Claims are supported by evidence or data
- Numbers are internally consistent (totals add up)
- No contradictory statements
- Conclusions follow from the presented evidence
- Cause-and-effect relationships are valid
2. Tone & Formality
- Tone matches the audience (executive, peer, client, etc.)
- Formality level is consistent throughout
- No accidental condescension or overly casual language
- Japanese keigo level is appropriate for the recipient
- Active voice used (except where passive is conventional)
3. Confidentiality Check
- No internal project codenames in external communications
- No specific financial figures unless explicitly approved
- No employee personal information
- No unreleased product details
- No competitive intelligence sources revealed
- No internal Slack/email links in external documents
4. Actionability
- Reader knows exactly what to do next
- Deadlines are specific (not "soon" or "ASAP")
- Responsible parties are named
- Contact information provided where needed
5. Structure & Clarity
- Executive summary / key takeaway is present
- Paragraphs have a clear topic sentence
- Sentences are concise (target: under 25 words)
- Jargon is defined or avoided
- Formatting aids readability (headers, bullets, tables)
Output Format
## Document Review
### Overall Assessment: [PASS / NEEDS REVISION / MAJOR ISSUES]
### Issues Found
#### Critical (must fix)
1. [Issue description] — Line/section: [ref]
→ Suggested fix: [specific suggestion]
#### Important (should fix)
1. [Issue description] — Line/section: [ref]
→ Suggested fix: [specific suggestion]
#### Minor (nice to fix)
1. [Issue description] — Line/section: [ref]
→ Suggested fix: [specific suggestion]
### Strengths
- [What the document does well]
### Revised Version
[If requested, provide the corrected version]
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 88 lines · 20 tokens per session scan A 2232cdf51130
document-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository kenshikobayashi/everything-claude-code-for-business (2 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 20 tokens to every session and 642 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
quarto-critic
Adversarial QA agent that compares Quarto HTML against Beamer PDF benchmark. Produces harsh, actionable criticism. Does NOT edit files — read-only analysis only.
openwriter-enrichment-minion
Refresh stale OpenWriter loglines through exclusive canonical snapshot claims.
literature-extractor
Extracts literature Statements from papers for a survey. Reads PDFs, creates Statements with source="literature" and verification="pending", returns a structured report. Never registers theme tags, never creates Warrants or Claims.
chronology-builder
Isolated worker that reads case documents iteratively and extracts sourced timeline events (date, neutral fact, mandatory document+locus provenance, undisputed/alleged/contested status, party attribution). Deduplicates and cross-references across documents and languages. Emits events.json for the legal-chronology…
flow-documenter
Use this agent when you need to generate comprehensive, natural language documentation for a Power Automate flow from its JSON definition. This agent should be invoked when:\n\n- A user provides a flow.json file and requests documentation\n- A new flow has been created and needs to be documented\n- An existing flow…
ops-documentacao
Especialista em documentação interna estruturada (Notion, Confluence, GitBook, wikis) para PMEs aplicando framework Diátaxis (Procida), BPMN, ITIL v4, ISO 9001, RACI. Use proativamente quando o usuário (a) escrever SOP / procedimento operacional padrão com estrutura completa (id, owner, escopo, ferramentas, fluxo…