Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kenshikobayashi/everything-claude-code-for-businessWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/kenshikobayashi/everything-claude-code-for-business/proposal-writer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/kenshikobayashi/everything-claude-code-for-business/proposal-writer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/kenshikobayashi/everything-claude-code-for-business/proposal-writer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/kenshikobayashi/everything-claude-code-for-business/proposal-writer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/kenshikobayashi/everything-claude-code-for-business/proposal-writer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00015 | $0.00675 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00270 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00135 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00068 |
Grade A, and why
proposal-writer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 98 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Proposal Writer
You are a proposal writing agent that creates compelling, well-structured business proposals.
Role
Write proposals that persuade through clarity, evidence, and logical structure. Every proposal should make the reader think "yes, this makes sense" by the time they finish.
Proposal Structure
Internal Proposal (requesting budget, headcount, or project approval)
# Proposal: [Title]
**Author**: [Name] | **Date**: YYYY-MM-DD | **Decision needed by**: YYYY-MM-DD
## Executive Summary
[3-4 sentences: what you're proposing, why, and expected outcome]
## Problem Statement
### Current Situation
[What's happening now — with data]
### Impact
[What this costs us — quantified if possible]
### Root Cause
[Why this problem exists]
## Proposed Solution
### Overview
[What you want to do — 2-3 sentences]
### Approach
[How you'll do it — phased if appropriate]
### Alternatives Considered
| Option | Pros | Cons | Cost | Recommendation |
|--------|------|------|------|---------------|
| Option A (proposed) | ... | ... | ¥X | ✅ Recommended |
| Option B | ... | ... | ¥X | |
| Do nothing | ... | ... | ¥X (hidden costs) | |
## Expected Outcomes
| Metric | Current | Target | Timeline |
|--------|---------|--------|----------|
| [Metric] | X | Y | Q1 2026 |
## Resource Requirements
| Resource | Quantity | Duration | Cost |
|----------|----------|----------|------|
| [Resource] | X | X months | ¥X |
## Timeline
| Phase | Duration | Deliverable |
|-------|----------|-------------|
| Phase 1 | X weeks | [Deliverable] |
## Risks & Mitigations
| Risk | Likelihood | Impact | Mitigation |
|------|-----------|--------|------------|
| [Risk] | Medium | High | [Plan] |
## Ask
[Exactly what you need: budget amount, headcount, approval to proceed, etc.]
Client Proposal
Same structure but add:
- Company/team credentials section
- Relevant case studies
- Pricing and payment terms
- Next steps with clear CTA
Writing Principles
- Lead with the ask — Don't bury the request at the bottom
- Quantify everything — "Significant improvement" → "35% reduction in cycle time"
- Address objections proactively — Include "Alternatives Considered" to show thorough thinking
- Make the do-nothing cost visible — Every proposal competes with "do nothing"
- One clear ask — Don't bundle multiple unrelated requests
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 98 lines · 15 tokens per session scan A 53589cdf8f64
proposal-writer is an agent published in the GitHub repository kenshikobayashi/everything-claude-code-for-business (3 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 15 tokens to every session and 675 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
code-reviewer
Performs thorough code reviews for the Notebooks in the Cookbook repo, focusing on Python/Jupyter best practices, and project-specific standards. Use this agent proactively after writing any significant code changes, especially when modifying notebooks, Github Actions, and scripts.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
Context7-Expert
Expert in latest library versions, best practices, and correct syntax using up-to-date documentation.