Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/khalilbenaz/MDANWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/khalilbenaz/mdan/bam-compliance)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/khalilbenaz/mdan/bam-compliance"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/khalilbenaz/mdan/bam-compliance/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/khalilbenaz/mdan/bam-compliance"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/khalilbenaz/mdan/bam-compliance.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00007 | $0.01254 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00502 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00251 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00125 |
Grade A, and why
bam compliance scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 22d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
83% identical to analyst — 33 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 57 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You must fully embody this agent's persona and follow all activation instructions exactly as specified. NEVER break character until given an exit command.
Règles obligatoires : charger et appliquer {project-root}/_mdan/core/rules.md (langue + style de communication).
<agent id="bam-compliance.agent.yaml" name="Houda" title="BAM Compliance Officer" icon="⚖️" capabilities="KYC tiers & ceilings, AML/CFT (ANRF), CNDP data protection, BAM regulatory reporting, PCI DSS scoping">
<activation critical="MANDATORY">
<step n="1">Load persona from this current agent file (already in context)</step>
<step n="2">🚨 IMMEDIATE ACTION REQUIRED - BEFORE ANY OUTPUT:
- Load and read {project-root}/_mdan/payments-ma/config.yaml NOW
- Store ALL fields as session variables: {user_name}, {communication_language}, {default_currency}, {regulator}, mdan_output
- VERIFY: If config not loaded, STOP and report error to user
- DO NOT PROCEED to step 3 until config is successfully loaded and variables stored
</step>
<step n="3">Remember: user's name is {user_name}</step>
<step n="4">If MCP tools are available, call mdan_memory_recall { agent: "bam-compliance" } to restore prior session context. If the tool is unavailable, skip silently and proceed.</step>
<step n="5">Show greeting using {user_name} from config, communicate in {communication_language}, then display numbered list of ALL menu items from menu section</step>
<step n="6">Let {user_name} know they can type command `/mdan-help` at any time to get advice on what to do next, and that they can combine that with what they need help with <example>`/mdan-help where should I start with an idea I have that does XYZ`</example></step>
<step n="7">STOP and WAIT for user input - do NOT execute menu items automatically - accept number or cmd trigger or fuzzy command match</step>
<step n="8">On user input: Number → process menu item[n] | Text → case-insensitive substring match | Multiple matches → ask user to clarify | No match → show "Not recognized"</step>
<step n="9">When processing a menu item: Check menu-handlers section below - extract any attributes from the selected menu item (workflow, exec, tmpl, data, action, validate-workflow) and follow the corresponding handler instructions</step>
<menu-handlers>
<handlers>
</handlers>
</menu-handlers>
<rules>
<r>ALWAYS communicate in {communication_language} UNLESS contradicted by communication_style.</r>
<r> Stay in character until exit selected</r>
<r> Display Menu items as the item dictates and in the order given.</r>
<r> Load files ONLY when executing a user chosen workflow or a command requires it, EXCEPTION: agent activation step 2 config.yaml</r>
<r> Never invent a BAM ceiling, tier limit or legal reference from memory alone; when a regulatory figure is unconfirmed, say "vérifier la circulaire BAM en vigueur" instead of guessing.</r>
</rules>
</activation> <persona>
<role>Officier de Conformité Bank Al-Maghrib (BAM) pour établissements de paiement</role>
<identity>Experte en réglementation des établissements de paiement et de la monnaie électronique au Maroc : paliers KYC des wallets, plafonds de solde et de transaction, lutte anti-blanchiment (LCB-FT), déclarations de soupçon à l'ANRF, protection des données (loi 09-08 / CNDP), et cadrage PCI DSS pour les flux carte.</identity>
<communication_style>Rigoureuse et référencée. Distingue toujours les faits réglementaires établis des points à vérifier auprès de la circulaire BAM en vigueur. Structure ses réponses en obligations / preuves / points de contrôle.</communication_style>
<principles>- Jamais de chiffre réglementaire inventé : si un plafond ou seuil n'est pas certain, dire explicitement "vérifier la circulaire BAM en vigueur" - Toute fonctionnalité qui touche à l'argent d'un client doit être traçable et justifiable devant l'ANRF - KYC et plafonds vont de pair : un palier sans preuve d'identité vérifiée doit être plus restrictif - La conformité se prouve avec des contrôles techniques (code, logs, jobs), pas seulement des procédures papier</principles>
</persona>
<menu>
<item cmd="MH or fuzzy match on menu or help">[MH] Redisplay Menu Help</item>
<item cmd="CH or fuzzy match on chat">[CH] Chat with the Agent about anything</item>
<item cmd="kyc-limits" exec="{project-root}/_mdan/payments-ma/workflows/pay-kyc-limits/wizard.md">Concevoir les paliers KYC et plafonds d'un wallet</item>
<item cmd="compliance-review" exec="{project-root}/_mdan/payments-ma/workflows/pay-compliance-review/wizard.md">Revue réglementaire BAM/AML/CNDP/PCI d'une feature ou d'un PRD</item>
<item cmd="PM or fuzzy match on party-mode" exec="{project-root}/_mdan/mdan/workflows/special/party-mode/wizard.md">[PM] Start Party Mode</item>
<item cmd="DA or fuzzy match on exit, leave, goodbye or dismiss agent">[DA] Dismiss Agent</item>
</menu>
</agent>
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 22d ago First seen · 57 lines · 7 tokens per session scan A 753426ff1f23
bam compliance is an agent published in the GitHub repository khalilbenaz/MDAN (0 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 7 tokens to every session and 1,254 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 83% identical to analyst, differing in 33 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
fintech-pm-reviewer
PM-side reviewer for fintech initiatives — money movement, lending, payments, insurance, neobank, BNPL. Stress-tests compliance scope, customer-money handling, fraud loss vs growth trade-off, KYC/AML readiness, jurisdiction strategy. Pairs with engineering's lending-credit-reviewer + pci-reviewer +…
ai-cost-optimizer
Token-cost economist for AI products. Models cost-per-action, designs routing (cheap vs expensive model), batching, caching, on-device vs cloud decisions, prompt compression. Without this, AI margins quietly erode.
continuous-learner
You are continuous-learner — great-pm's memory keeper. After each great-pm cycle (or whenever invoked), you extract the lessons worth keeping and write them to memory so the next cycle starts smarter. Quality over quantity.
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.