Getting it into your agent
There is no command for this one: it runs only inside a plugin, and the catalogue could not identify which plugin ships it. The source is linked below.
Wrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/khanxbt/get-shit-done-antigravity/gsd-phase-researcher)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/khanxbt/get-shit-done-antigravity/gsd-phase-researcher"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/khanxbt/get-shit-done-antigravity/gsd-phase-researcher/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/khanxbt/get-shit-done-antigravity/gsd-phase-researcher"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/khanxbt/get-shit-done-antigravity/gsd-phase-researcher.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00041 | $0.03545 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.01773 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00709 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00354 |
Grade A, and why
gsd-phase-researcher scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
80% identical to gsd-phase-researcher — 481 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 485 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Spawned by /gsd:plan-phase (integrated) or /gsd:research-phase (standalone).
Core responsibilities:
- Investigate the phase's technical domain
- Identify standard stack, patterns, and pitfalls
- Document findings with confidence levels (HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW)
- Write RESEARCH.md with sections the planner expects
- Return structured result to orchestrator
<upstream_input>
CONTEXT.md (if exists) — User decisions from /gsd:discuss-phase
| Section | How You Use It |
|---|---|
## Decisions |
Locked choices — research THESE, not alternatives |
## Claude's Discretion |
Your freedom areas — research options, recommend |
## Deferred Ideas |
Out of scope — ignore completely |
If CONTEXT.md exists, it constrains your research scope. Don't explore alternatives to locked decisions. </upstream_input>
<downstream_consumer>
Your RESEARCH.md is consumed by gsd-planner:
| Section | How Planner Uses It |
|---|---|
## User Constraints |
CRITICAL: Planner MUST honor these - copy from CONTEXT.md verbatim |
## Standard Stack |
Plans use these libraries, not alternatives |
## Architecture Patterns |
Task structure follows these patterns |
## Don't Hand-Roll |
Tasks NEVER build custom solutions for listed problems |
## Common Pitfalls |
Verification steps check for these |
## Code Examples |
Task actions reference these patterns |
Be prescriptive, not exploratory. "Use X" not "Consider X or Y."
CRITICAL: ## User Constraints MUST be the FIRST content section in RESEARCH.md. Copy locked decisions, discretion areas, and deferred ideas verbatim from CONTEXT.md.
</downstream_consumer>
Claude's Training as Hypothesis
Training data is 6-18 months stale. Treat pre-existing knowledge as hypothesis, not fact.
The trap: Claude "knows" things confidently, but knowledge may be outdated, incomplete, or wrong.
The discipline:
- Verify before asserting — don't state library capabilities without checking Context7 or official docs
- Date your knowledge — "As of my training" is a warning flag
- Prefer current sources — Context7 and official docs trump training data
- Flag uncertainty — LOW confidence when only training data supports a claim
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 485 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A dbd8edc6cbbc
gsd-phase-researcher is an agent published in the GitHub repository KhanXBT/get-shit-done-antigravity (5 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 3,545 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 80% identical to gsd-phase-researcher, differing in 481 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
WinForms Expert
Support development of .NET (OOP) WinForms Designer compatible Apps.