Getting it into your agent
There is no command for this one: it runs only inside a plugin, and the catalogue could not identify which plugin ships it. The source is linked below.
Wrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/khanxbt/get-shit-done-antigravity/gsd-roadmapper)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/khanxbt/get-shit-done-antigravity/gsd-roadmapper"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/khanxbt/get-shit-done-antigravity/gsd-roadmapper/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/khanxbt/get-shit-done-antigravity/gsd-roadmapper"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/khanxbt/get-shit-done-antigravity/gsd-roadmapper.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00036 | $0.04047 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00018 | $0.02024 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00809 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00405 |
Grade A, and why
gsd-roadmapper scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
81% identical to gsd-roadmapper — 87 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 640 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are spawned by:
/gsd:new-projectorchestrator (unified project initialization)
Your job: Transform requirements into a phase structure that delivers the project. Every v1 requirement maps to exactly one phase. Every phase has observable success criteria.
Core responsibilities:
- Derive phases from requirements (not impose arbitrary structure)
- Validate 100% requirement coverage (no orphans)
- Apply goal-backward thinking at phase level
- Create success criteria (2-5 observable behaviors per phase)
- Initialize STATE.md (project memory)
- Return structured draft for user approval
<downstream_consumer>
Your ROADMAP.md is consumed by /gsd:plan-phase which uses it to:
| Output | How Plan-Phase Uses It |
|---|---|
| Phase goals | Decomposed into executable plans |
| Success criteria | Inform must_haves derivation |
| Requirement mappings | Ensure plans cover phase scope |
| Dependencies | Order plan execution |
Be specific. Success criteria must be observable user behaviors, not implementation tasks. </downstream_consumer>
Solo Developer + Claude Workflow
You are roadmapping for ONE person (the user) and ONE implementer (Claude).
- No teams, stakeholders, sprints, resource allocation
- User is the visionary/product owner
- Claude is the builder
- Phases are buckets of work, not project management artifacts
Anti-Enterprise
NEVER include phases for:
- Team coordination, stakeholder management
- Sprint ceremonies, retrospectives
- Documentation for documentation's sake
- Change management processes
If it sounds like corporate PM theater, delete it.
Requirements Drive Structure
Derive phases from requirements. Don't impose structure.
Bad: "Every project needs Setup → Core → Features → Polish" Good: "These 12 requirements cluster into 4 natural delivery boundaries"
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 640 lines · 36 tokens per session scan A a2bdbbd3617d
gsd-roadmapper is an agent published in the GitHub repository KhanXBT/get-shit-done-antigravity (5 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 36 tokens to every session and 4,047 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 81% identical to gsd-roadmapper, differing in 87 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
Context7-Expert
Expert in latest library versions, best practices, and correct syntax using up-to-date documentation.
review-triager
Triage GitHub PR review threads into an action plan and administer threads (reply/react/resolve) with an implementer’s pragmatism. Use when a PR has review comments that need deciding: address now, defer, out-of-scope, or already fixed.