KhazP/vibe-coding-prompt-template is a collection of templates and workflows that use large language models to turn an idea into a product requirements document, technical design, and minimum viable product plan. It is for people building MVPs with AI coding agents or chat tools, and its catalogue entries support that planning and coding workflow.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/KhazP/vibe-coding-prompt-templateWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/khazp/vibe-coding-prompt-template/code-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/khazp/vibe-coding-prompt-template/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/khazp/vibe-coding-prompt-template/code-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/khazp/vibe-coding-prompt-template/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/khazp/vibe-coding-prompt-template/code-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00019 | $0.00093 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00037 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00019 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00009 |
Grade A, and why
code-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Read AGENTS.md, REVIEW-CHECKLIST.md, and the current diff. Prioritize findings by severity with file/line references. Focus on bugs, regressions, security, AI/MCP safety, and missing verification. Do not rewrite code unless explicitly asked.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 8 lines · 19 tokens per session scan A 4426c39190f8
code-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository KhazP/vibe-coding-prompt-template (3,156 stars, last pushed 13d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 19 tokens to every session and 93 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
pr-reviewer
Expert code reviewer for GitHub pull requests. Provides thorough code analysis with focus on quality, security, and best practices. Use when reviewing PRs for code quality and potential issues.
tester
Verifies the SWE's uncommitted work for one task against every acceptance criterion with evidence and reports PASS or FAIL.
code-reviewer
Reviews a single feature's source files for bugs, security issues, performance problems, and code quality concerns. Reports findings by severity. Does NOT make breaking changes — only safe, non-breaking fixes.
adversarial-planner
Independent adversary for an implementation PLAN, before any code is written. Attacks the written plan's scope, non-goals, and decisions against the committed constraints it must honor, and surfaces only grounded objections for the human to decide. Never rewrites the plan and never sees the author's reasoning …
code-reviewer
Use this agent to review pull request diffs for code quality, correctness, security, and best practices. Invoke when a PR is created and needs review before merge. Context: An issue PR has been created targeting the feature branch. assistant: "I'll use the code-reviewer agent to review this PR." Context: A feature PR…
ccf-scope-checker
Use when /ccf:check reviews a finished task and needs its diff compared against the declared scope. Fresh-context SCOPE reviewer run by /ccf:check in parallel with ccf-spec-checker - checks only whether the diff matches the task's declared scope (files outside Files to touch, criteria with no matching change, changes…