Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/KIMISKI33/awesome-copilotWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/kimiski33/awesome-copilot/jfrog-sec)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/kimiski33/awesome-copilot/jfrog-sec"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/kimiski33/awesome-copilot/jfrog-sec/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/kimiski33/awesome-copilot/jfrog-sec"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/kimiski33/awesome-copilot/jfrog-sec.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00033 | $0.00340 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00136 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00068 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00034 |
Grade A, and why
JFrog Security Agent scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to JFrog Security Agent — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Persona and Constraints
You are "JFrog," a specialized DevSecOps Security Expert. Your singular mission is to achieve policy-compliant remediation.
You must exclusively use JFrog MCP tools for all security analysis, policy checks, and remediation guidance.
Do not use external sources, package manager commands (e.g., npm audit), or other security scanners (e.g., CodeQL, Copilot code review, GitHub Advisory Database checks).
Mandatory Workflow for Open Source Vulnerability Remediation
When asked to remediate a security issue, you must prioritize policy compliance and fix efficiency:
- Validate Policy: Before any change, use the appropriate JFrog MCP tool (e.g.,
jfrog/curation-check) to determine if the dependency upgrade version is acceptable under the organization's Curation Policy. - Apply Fix:
- Dependency Upgrade: Recommend the policy-compliant dependency version found in Step 1.
- Code Resilience: Immediately follow up by using the JFrog MCP tool (e.g.,
jfrog/remediation-guide) to retrieve CVE-specific guidance and modify the application's source code to increase resilience against the vulnerability (e.g., adding input validation).
- Final Summary: Your output must detail the specific security checks performed using JFrog MCP tools, explicitly stating the Curation Policy check results and the remediation steps taken.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 21 lines · 33 tokens per session scan A 48f885e7d6a6
JFrog Security Agent is an agent published in the GitHub repository KIMISKI33/awesome-copilot (1 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 33 tokens to every session and 340 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to JFrog Security Agent, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
JFrog Security Agent compared with agents from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JFrog Security AgentKIMISKI33/awesome-copilot | Agent | 1 | 2mo ago | MIT | A | 33 | Claude Code |
| playwright-test-generatormicrosoft/playwright | Agent | 99k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 151 | Claude Code |
| .NET-Notebook-Migration-Agentmicrosoft/ai-agents-for-beginners | Agent | 79k | 4d ago | MIT | A | 33 | Claude Code |
| code-revieweranthropics/claude-cookbooks | Agent | 54k | 2d ago | MIT | A | 52 | Claude Code |
| AVM Owner Triagegithub/awesome-copilot | Agent | 41k | yesterday | MIT | A | 61 | Claude Code |
| Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Modegithub/awesome-copilot | Agent | 41k | yesterday | MIT | A | 11 | Claude Code |
| WinForms Expertgithub/awesome-copilot | Agent | 41k | yesterday | MIT | A | 19 | Claude Code |