Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to kimsanguine/AI_PM. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/kimsanguine/AI_PM/main/.claude/agents/engineering-reviewer.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kimsanguine/AI_PMWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/kimsanguine/ai_pm/engineering-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/kimsanguine/ai_pm/engineering-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/kimsanguine/ai_pm/engineering-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/kimsanguine/ai_pm/engineering-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/kimsanguine/ai_pm/engineering-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00049 | $0.00459 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00184 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00092 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00046 |
Grade A, and why
engineering-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 44 lines · 49 tokens per session scan A 24836a79f346
engineering-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository kimsanguine/AI_PM (57 stars, last pushed 4d ago), with no licence file. It adds 49 tokens to every session and 459 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
pr-reviewer
PR review specialist. Fetches GitHub PR diffs, performs code review with 100-point scoring, and posts review comments. Supports inline comments on specific lines. Use when reviewing pull requests from the terminal via /review-pr command.
code-formatter
Expert code formatter and linter specialist. Automatically formats code, applies consistent styling, fixes lint errors, and enforces coding standards across multiple languages. Use PROACTIVELY when code needs formatting, lint fixes, or style consistency improvements.
reviewer
Code review specialist. Use after writing or modifying code. Checks for bugs, security issues, convention violations, and unnecessary complexity.
reviewer
Code reviewer — analyzes diffs and source for bugs, security issues, and style violations. Read-only, no memory injection.
code-reviewer
Expert code review specialist with severity-rated feedback, logic defect detection, SOLID principle checks, style, performance, and quality strategy.
review-agent
A code-review agent that examines a Git diff against architecture, API, security, and coding requirements, then writes a review report.