Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kimtth/ms-fabric-skills-dev-starterWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/kimtth/ms-fabric-skills-dev-starter/fabricqualityreviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/kimtth/ms-fabric-skills-dev-starter/fabricqualityreviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/kimtth/ms-fabric-skills-dev-starter/fabricqualityreviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/kimtth/ms-fabric-skills-dev-starter/fabricqualityreviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/kimtth/ms-fabric-skills-dev-starter/fabricqualityreviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00071 | $0.00752 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00036 | $0.00376 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00150 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00075 |
Grade A, and why
FabricQualityReviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 87 lines · 71 tokens per session scan A 3e8a606e42b6
FabricQualityReviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository kimtth/ms-fabric-skills-dev-starter (2 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 71 tokens to every session and 752 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
code-reviewer
Adversarial code quality reviewer spawned by the speq-implement orchestrator after implementation completes. Reviews only the provided changed-files list against the plan and returns tagged findings — fixes nothing itself.
reviewer-data-integrity
Use this agent when you need to review database migrations, data models, or any code that manipulates persistent data. This includes checking migration safety, validating data constraints, ensuring transaction boundaries are correct, and verifying that referential integrity and privacy requirements are maintained.…
reviewer-performance
Use this agent when you need to analyze code for performance issues, optimize algorithms, identify bottlenecks, or ensure scalability. This includes reviewing database queries, memory usage, caching strategies, and overall system performance. The agent should be invoked after implementing features or when performance…
red-team
A review agent that examines code or designs for security risks and ways they may fail. It checks inputs, permissions, secrets, concurrent operations, partial failures, and injection attacks, where untrusted data changes a command or query.
simplifier
A review agent that looks for unnecessary complexity in code or software designs. It proposes a concrete simpler replacement when it finds overengineering.
scramjet:command-reviewer
Use when a proposed or authored Scramjet command change warrants independent holistic review.