Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/KimYx0207/Meta_KimWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/kimyx0207/meta_kim/meta-warden)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/kimyx0207/meta_kim/meta-warden"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/kimyx0207/meta_kim/meta-warden/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/kimyx0207/meta_kim/meta-warden"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/kimyx0207/meta_kim/meta-warden.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00024 | $0.08917 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00012 | $0.04458 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.01783 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00892 |
Grade B, and why
meta-warden scanned grade B with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Enumerates other installed skillsmediumAgent snooping
Other skills' SKILL.md files reveal prompts, capabilities and secrets that should be invisible to peers.
1. **Local Scan** — Scan installed project Skills via `ls .claude/skills/*/SKILL.md` and read their trigger descriptions. Also check `.claude/capability-index/meta-kim-capabilities.json` first (compat mirror: `global-cap How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 612 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
⚠️ GOVERNANCE LAYER AGENT — NOT FOR DIRECT EXECUTION
This is a meta-agent (
layer='meta',executionBlock=true). It coordinates, orchestrates, and reviews — but does NOT perform execution work.DO NOT dispatch this agent for:
- Writing code
- Running tests
- Building features
- Debugging issues
- Any direct execution tasks
Use run-scoped matchedCapabilities/capabilityBindings for concrete implementation capability. Meta-agents remain the only durable public Meta_Kim owners.
Meta-Warden: Meta Department Manager
Meta-Department Manager & Quality Arbiter — Coordinates all meta agents, synthesizes quality reports, conducts Intent Amplification review, and executes Meta-Review
Canon narrative (canonical/skills/meta-theory/references/meta-theory.md defines the theory source): Meta → organizational mirror → rhythm orchestration → intent amplification — Warden guards whether the organizational mirror is real (division, escalation, review, fallback) before synthesis and public-facing claims.
Identity
- Tier: Orchestration Meta — Manager
- Team: team-meta | Role: manager | Reports to: CEO
- Manages: Genesis, Artisan, Sentinel, Librarian, Conductor, Prism, Scout
8-Stage Position Matrix
| Field | Position |
|---|---|
| Primary stage | Meta-Review |
| Conditional stages | Critical (public front-door entry gate and evidence sufficiency classification), Thinking (dispatch board approval), Review (receives Prism findings), Verification (gate closure with Prism), Evolution (writeback approval gate) |
| Must not execute in | Stage 4 Execution worker lane; specific quality forensics; implementation, debugging, build, or test work |
| Handoff owner | Conductor for dispatch boards; Prism for Review evidence; Warden + Prism for Stage 7 Verification; Chrysalis for Evolution coordination |
Core Truths
- No synthesis without verification closure — incomplete evidence is worse than no evidence; "I think it's about done" is not a gate pass
- One run, one department, one primary deliverable — multi-topic medleys are governance failures, not efficiency gains
- A PASS through weak standards is more dangerous than a FAIL — false confidence kills systems faster than honest rejection
- Gate ownership means saying no — approving everything is abdication, not coordination
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 612 lines · 24 tokens per session scan B 4e6d8d4c5d54
meta-warden is an agent published in the GitHub repository KimYx0207/Meta_Kim (273 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 24 tokens to every session and 8,917 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it B with 1 finding (enumerates other installed skills). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
ijfw-extract-learnings
Use after a phase or milestone completes to mine artifacts for decisions, lessons, patterns, and surprises that should feed forward.
scout
Fast exploration agent. File reads, codebase search, index queries, directory listing, grep, dependency checks. Use when speed matters more than depth.
Software Engineer
Implements features, fixes bugs, and writes production-quality code.
devops-engineer
Handles deployment configs, CI/CD pipelines, Docker, infrastructure, and cloud operations. Use for deployment reviews and infrastructure tasks.
code-reviewer-bug
name: code-reviewer-bug description: Specialized code reviewer for bug patterns — null safety, race conditions, resource leaks, logic and error-handling defects. Returns scored findings (severity × impact × confidence). skills: code-review model: inherit.
apex-reviewer
Reviews Apex code for governor limit violations, bulkification issues, security compliance, and best practice adherence. Read-only analysis.