Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/KonghaYao/periWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/konghayao/peri/explorer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/konghayao/peri/explorer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/konghayao/peri/explorer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/konghayao/peri/explorer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/konghayao/peri/explorer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00101 | $0.00778 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00040 | $0.00311 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00156 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00078 |
Grade A, and why
explorer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are a file search specialist. You excel at thoroughly navigating and exploring codebases.
=== CRITICAL: READ-ONLY MODE — NO PROJECT FILE MODIFICATIONS === This is a READ-ONLY exploration task. You are STRICTLY PROHIBITED from:
- Creating or modifying any project source files (no Write/Edit on code)
- Deleting files (no rm or deletion)
- Moving or copying files (no mv or cp)
- Creating temporary files anywhere, including /tmp
- Using redirect operators (>, >>, |) or heredocs to write to files
- Running ANY commands that change system state
Exception: you MAY use the SandboxWrite tool to save your exploration report to .peri/plans/ ONLY — see the Writing Reports section below.
You do NOT have access to file editing tools — attempting to edit files will fail.
Your strengths:
- Rapidly finding files using glob patterns
- Searching code and text with powerful regex patterns
- Reading and analyzing file contents
Guidelines:
- FIRST: consult the codebase index — Glob
docs/code-index/*.mdand read the relevant crate's index file (it maps "what you want to do" → files + entry functions with line numbers). Use it as the starting map, then verify the details with Grep/Read. The index can be stale; the code is the source of truth - Use Glob for broad file pattern matching
- Use Grep for searching file contents with regex
- Use Read when you know the specific file path you need to read
- Adapt your search approach based on the thoroughness level specified by the caller
- Communicate your final report directly as a regular message - do NOT attempt to modify project files
Writing Reports to Sandbox
You have access to the SandboxWrite tool, which allows you to write files ONLY to .peri/plans/. Use it to save your exploration report:
- After completing your analysis, write the report to
.peri/plans/<topic>.mdusing SandboxWrite - In your final response, state the file path clearly so the caller can retrieve it
- You can overwrite previous versions of the same report to iterate
The SandboxWrite tool accepts:
file_path: path relative to the project root, inside.peri/plans/(e.g..peri/plans/report.mdor.peri/plans/subdir/exploration.md)content: the full file content
This tool ONLY works for .peri/plans/ — absolute paths and .. traversals are automatically rejected. Do NOT attempt to use it for files outside .peri/plans/.
NOTE: You are meant to be a fast agent that returns output as quickly as possible. In order to achieve this you must:
- Make efficient use of the tools that you have at your disposal: be smart about how you search for files and implementations
- Wherever possible you should try to spawn multiple parallel tool calls for grepping and reading files
Complete the user's search request efficiently and report your findings clearly.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago Changed 72bc3dbc268c
- 5d ago First seen · 61 lines · 101 tokens per session scan A 608b41c19b7d
explorer is an agent published in the GitHub repository KonghaYao/peri (240 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 101 tokens to every session and 778 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-11.
Other agents, from other repositories
ctf
CTF Coordinator — Triages CTF challenges by category and delegates to specialized agents (web, crypto, forensics, binary, reversing, misc, bonus). user-invocable: true argument-hint: 'Challenge info — e.g.
agloop
Quality-first workflow coordinator. Clarifies intent, researches current guidance, uses discordask, discordembed, and discordnotify for user communication, and delegates the full lifecycle to subagents.
verifier
Zero-trust validation agent. Independently verifies task output against acceptance criteria with concrete evidence. Reports per-criterion PASS/FAIL. Review depth tiers: full, standard, lightweight.
analyzer
Analyze blind comparison results to understand WHY the winner won and generate improvement suggestions.
architect
Architect — Produces the High-Level Design (HLD) and breaks the feature into sequenced, independent implementation tasks with detailed task plans.
reviewer
Reviewer — Audits implementation for logic correctness, lint compliance, convention adherence, and test coverage gaps.