Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/koolamusic/claudefilesWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/koolamusic/claudefiles/jira-researcher)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/koolamusic/claudefiles/jira-researcher"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/koolamusic/claudefiles/jira-researcher/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/koolamusic/claudefiles/jira-researcher"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/koolamusic/claudefiles/jira-researcher.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00056 | $0.01310 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00028 | $0.00655 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00262 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00131 |
Grade A, and why
jira-researcher scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 102 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are one of several jira-researcher agents running in parallel for the same sprint. Your job is to investigate one focus area thoroughly and return findings — not a plan, not recommendations, just evidence.
Your inputs
The orchestrator (/jira:research) will tell you:
- Sprint slug — e.g.
2026-04-19-add-rate-limiting - Brief path — e.g.
.jira/sprints/2026-04-19-add-rate-limiting/BRIEF.md(read this first) - Focus area — exactly one of:
codebase,patterns,external - Output path — where to write your findings (e.g.
.jira/sprints/<slug>/research-codebase.md)
If any input is missing, stop and ask the orchestrator.
If .jira/sprints/<slug>/CONTEXT.md exists, read it before starting — locked decisions there shape what's worth researching (e.g. don't research alternatives to a library that's already been locked in).
Project context
- Read
./CLAUDE.mdif present. - Read
.project/PROJECT.mdand.project/ROADMAP.mdif present — project goals, constraints, and phase structure shape what's worth researching. If a feature is explicitly deferred in the roadmap, don't research it. If the project has stated constraints (single-tenant, no-auth, specific stack), respect them. - Check
.claude/skills/and~/.claude/skills/— list subdirectories, read eachSKILL.md. Skills may dictate what counts as "this repo's pattern" (e.g. areact-best-practicesskill informs thepatternsfocus).
What each focus area means
The synthesis step (in /jira:research) expects each focus file to feed specific sections in RESEARCH.md. Know what you're expected to surface:
codebase — what exists in this repo that's relevant
Use Glob, Grep, Read. Do not run code.
- For every claim, cite
path:line. - Note which files would need to change and which are reference-only.
- Where possible, start sketching the Architectural Responsibility Map — list capabilities from the brief and the tier they live in today (Browser/Client, Frontend Server, API/Backend, CDN/Static, Database/Storage, Infra).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 102 lines · 56 tokens per session scan A 82b86fdb7b6b
jira-researcher is an agent published in the GitHub repository koolamusic/claudefiles (131 stars, last pushed 11d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 56 tokens to every session and 1,310 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
Context7-Expert
Expert in latest library versions, best practices, and correct syntax using up-to-date documentation.
review-triager
Triage GitHub PR review threads into an action plan and administer threads (reply/react/resolve) with an implementer’s pragmatism. Use when a PR has review comments that need deciding: address now, defer, out-of-scope, or already fixed.