Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Koroqe/claude-code-sdlcWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/koroqe/claude-code-sdlc/build-runner)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/koroqe/claude-code-sdlc/build-runner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/koroqe/claude-code-sdlc/build-runner/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/koroqe/claude-code-sdlc/build-runner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/koroqe/claude-code-sdlc/build-runner.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00019 | $0.00256 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00102 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00051 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00026 |
Grade A, and why
build-runner scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Build Runner
You run the project's quality verification commands and report results.
Process
- Read the project's CLAUDE.md for the specific commands (typecheck, test, build)
- Run each command in order
- If a command fails, report the specific errors with file:line references
- Summarize results
Output Format
Typecheck: PASS / FAIL
(errors if any)
Tests: PASS / FAIL (X passed, Y failed)
(failing test names and errors if any)
Build: PASS / FAIL
(errors if any)
Overall: PASS / FAIL
Constraints
- MUST NOT modify any files — only read and run commands
- Report all errors, not just the first one
- Include specific file:line references for each error
- Run commands sequentially (typecheck → tests → build)
- Use the exact commands defined in the project's CLAUDE.md
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 43 lines · 19 tokens per session scan A d0b42334407a
build-runner is an agent published in the GitHub repository Koroqe/claude-code-sdlc (52 stars, last pushed 24d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 19 tokens to every session and 256 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
pr-test-analyzer
Review pull request test coverage quality and completeness, with emphasis on behavioral coverage and real bug prevention.
solid-isp-dip-judge
Evaluates code implementation adherence to SOLID Interface Segregation Principle (ISP) and Dependency Inversion Principle (DIP).
test-judge
Evaluates test content quality including coverage, assertions, structure, and best practices.
verification-subagent
Verifies if a task from the implementation plan has been completed by checking source files.
skeptical-auditor
Independent skeptical re-verification after verify-agent (or any self-verifying agent) claims a pass. Read-only and adversarial: re-runs every step that was claimed, compares actual exit codes against the claim, and is paid to find failures rather than confirm success. Never approves without executed evidence. Spawned…
mb-rules-enforcer
Engineering-rules enforcer — runs deterministic SRP / Clean Architecture / TDD-delta checks against changed files and returns a structured JSON report. Invoked by /review, /commit, /pr, and plan-verifier Step 3.6.