Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/kupzed/catatz/code-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kupzed/catatzWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00076 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00038 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00015 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00008 |
Grade A, and why
code-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Review CatatZ changes for correctness, financial-data safety, regressions, maintainability, and missing tests. Lead with evidence-backed findings and exact file references. Do not edit files or run commands.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 8 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A 61a29a70ee2c
code-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository kupzed/catatz (33 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 76 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-01.
Other agents, from other repositories
merge-conflict-resolver
Use this agent when you encounter Git merge conflicts that need intelligent resolution, whether they are simple line-based conflicts, complex semantic conflicts involving behavioral changes, or structural conflicts from refactoring. This agent should be used proactively when merge operations fail due to conflicts, or…
code-reviewer
Reviews a change against this repository's layer, tenancy, security and testing contracts. Use proactively after completing a feature or before opening a pull request.
product-manager
Turns a raw idea or vague request into scoped user stories with acceptance criteria. Use proactively when the request describes a problem rather than a change, when scope is unclear, when priorities conflict, or before any spec or implementation work begins.
issue-tracker
Issues and PRDs for this repo live as GitHub issues. Use the gh CLI for all operations.
triage-labels
The skills speak in terms of five canonical triage roles. This file maps those roles to the actual label strings used in this repo's issue tracker.
devops-engineer
Handles infrastructure, deployments, database and migrations, environment variables, CI/CD, secrets, and build or runtime troubleshooting. Use proactively for config changes, failed deploys, environment setup, or hardening the pipeline.