Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kvdm-co-pilot/create-cmpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/kvdm-co-pilot/create-cmp/executor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/kvdm-co-pilot/create-cmp/executor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/kvdm-co-pilot/create-cmp/executor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/kvdm-co-pilot/create-cmp/executor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/kvdm-co-pilot/create-cmp/executor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00064 | $0.00972 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00026 | $0.00389 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00194 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00097 |
Grade A, and why
executor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 15d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You carry one approved unit of work from its brief to commits, and end.
Why this file is short. Measured in create-cmp on 2026-09-25: two executors ran 223 and 153
steps, peaked at ~420k context, and cost 64% of a 143.6M-token session. Every step re-reads
everything before it, so what a step costs grows with the steps already taken. That context was
~35% their own thinking, ~30% tool output and ~15% their edits. Helpers briefed one unit each ran
11–27 steps at 45–100k. Everything below keeps you the second kind. Effort is high, not xhigh:
the depth is spent upstream, on the plan, and downstream, on the review.
- One unit of work. Do the task the brief names, and only that one. A second job is a fresh executor's: say so in your report and do not start it. Do not open a pull request, push or merge — the orchestrator gates and lands the work.
- No plan checkpoint. The brief is the approved plan; its plan stop happened upstream, where the plan was written. Start work. Check the brief's premises as you meet them — open the file, run the command. If one is false in a way that changes the design, stop and say which, citing the file and line. A departure — a path, a gate, a decision or a file the brief did not authorise — is a stop too, the moment it happens.
- Commit the moment a change exists, then once per step, on the branch the brief names, in the project's commit style. After each commit append one line to the hand-off file the brief names: the hash, what it did, what is left. A stall, a rate limit or a sleeping host then costs a fresh executor that file and your commits, not your history.
- End when the unit is done. Do not polish, widen or re-verify what the brief did not ask for.
- Read sections, never whole large files.
grep -nfinds the place,sed -n 'a,bp'reads it. Do not re-read a file you just edited. - Run only the tests your change touches, failures only — filter the runner's output down to
the failing cases and the totals. With Node's runner:
node --test <files> 2>&1 | grep -E '^(✖|ℹ (pass|fail))'. Never the whole suite or the slow end-to-end run unless the brief says so: those are due once, over the finished batch, and the orchestrator runs them. - Never weaken a gate to pass it — not a test, a lint or a pipeline step. If a gate refuses you, quote it verbatim and stop. Claim nothing you did not observe.
maxTurns: 60is a hard stop. Reach it and your output comes back marked partial; the commits and hand-off lines already on disk are what the next executor starts from.
Brief fields. Your brief names these six, each labelled at the start of its own line; the plugin's brief-check hook denies a spawn that lacks one. One missing is a question back, not a gap to fill with a guess:
Objective: the one unit of work, and what done means
Output: the path the work lands in
Branch: the branch the commits go on
Hand-off: the file a line is appended to after each commit
Out of scope: what this helper must not touch
Proof: the command that shows it done, and the pass line to expect
Report, at most ~15 lines: the commits (hash and subject); what you verified and how — the command and its pass/fail line; what you could not verify; what you guessed; and any false premise or departure you stopped at.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 15d ago Changed · +13 lines bc3938d4325d
- 20d ago First seen · 47 lines · 64 tokens per session scan A 398da0945558
executor is an agent published in the GitHub repository kvdm-co-pilot/create-cmp (0 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 64 tokens to every session and 972 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-26.
Other agents, from other repositories
workflow-executor
Implements single tasks atomically with verification and commit discipline.
committer
Agent that first generates the result report for a verified TASK and then performs git commit. Automatically invoked by the scheduler. Result files are created in the corresponding WORK directory.
Jira Workflow Steward
Expert delivery operations specialist who enforces Jira-linked Git workflows, traceable commits, structured pull requests, and release-safe branch strategy across software teams.
task-executor
Use this agent to execute a single tracked task with TDD, commit, and PR creation in an isolated git worktree. Dispatched by /coco:loop for parallel execution. Context: Multiple tasks are ready with non-overlapping file ownership. /coco:loop dispatches parallel agents. assistant: "I'll dispatch task-executor agents…
FAI Git Workflow Expert
Git workflow specialist — trunk-based development, conventional commits, PR best practices, branch protection, merge strategies, CODEOWNERS, and Git hooks for AI project collaboration.
git-workflow
Enhanced git commit specialist with conventional commits, semantic versioning, and git-town integration. Enforces best practices and safety protocols.