oh-my-design: Agent for Claude Code

.claude/agents/omd-final-qa.md

omd-final-qa is an agent for Claude Code from kwakseongjae/oh-my-design. It costs 46 tokens per session (368 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A read-only final quality gate for a design workflow. It checks all supplied project artifacts against an eight-part review rubric and issues a revision or block decision.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it before handing work to a user to review the design, content, assets, tests, and previous review reports, then write an evidence-based final report.
Why use it?
It prevents vague approvals such as “looks good” and makes failures traceable to specific lines and fixes. It also limits revisions to two rounds.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: installed under .claude/. Also seen: model in frontmatter.

This is kwakseongjae/oh-my-design's own configuration. It tells Claude Code how to work on oh-my-design itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything oh-my-design configures →

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to kwakseongjae/oh-my-design. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/kwakseongjae/oh-my-design/main/.claude/agents/omd-final-qa.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kwakseongjae/oh-my-design

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for omd-final-qa

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/kwakseongjae/oh-my-design/omd-final-qa/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/kwakseongjae/oh-my-design/omd-final-qa)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/kwakseongjae/oh-my-design/omd-final-qa"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/kwakseongjae/oh-my-design/omd-final-qa/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for omd-final-qa

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/kwakseongjae/oh-my-design/omd-final-qa"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/kwakseongjae/oh-my-design/omd-final-qa.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 46 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 368 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00046 $0.00368
Opus 5 $0.00023 $0.00184
Sonnet 5 $0.00009 $0.00074
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00037

Measured 12d ago against content hash 3443329323b7, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

omd-final-qa scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/agents/omd-final-qa.md · 42 lines

What it actually says

omd-final-qa

Final gate before user handoff. Read-only. Closed rubric.

Boot

  1. Read the installed omd-final-qa/SKILL.md from the active host's skill root in full
  2. Read every artifact in artifact_paths
  3. Re-read design_md_path — record timestamp
  4. Read prior_reviews (designer-review reports) if present

Rubric execution

Evaluate all 8 rubric items (§1 of skill). For each:

  • PASS requires a 1-line evidence statement
  • FAIL requires line ref + verbatim quote + fix direction

Any FAIL → verdict = REVISION (round 1) or BLOCK (round 2).

Output

Write to <work_dir>/.reviews/final-qa-round-<N>.md. End with explicit verdict.

Hard prohibitions

  • "Looks good", "전반적으로 OK", "괜찮음" → self-reject the draft and rewrite with specific evidence.
  • Modifying any artifact → bug. Never use Write/Edit.
  • Caching DESIGN.md across rounds → invalid.
  • Adding/removing rubric items mid-run → forbidden. Rubric updates only via SKILL.md PR.

Round-2 escalation

If round 2 still FAILs, output verdict = BLOCK and stop. Orchestrator handles user escalation.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 12d ago First seen · 42 lines · 46 tokens per session scan A 3443329323b7

Subscribe to this mod's changes

omd-final-qa is an agent published in the GitHub repository kwakseongjae/oh-my-design (500 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 46 tokens to every session and 368 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.