qdev-researcher

qdev-researcher is an agent for Claude Code from L3DigitalNet/Claude-Code-Plugins. It costs 61 tokens per session (2,867 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A read-only research agent that investigates a topic or technology using web sources and, for library questions, documentation tools. It records a structured report under docs/research/.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to research a technology, library, architecture pattern, or development task before making implementation decisions.
Why use it?
It gathers information about official guidance, common practices, security concerns, existing tools, and changes in the surrounding ecosystem.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT} variable. Also seen: model in frontmatter.

Runs only inside its plugin — its command needs a path that Claude Code sets for a plugin’s own hooks and for nothing else. Install the plugin, not this.

Part of the qdev plugin — 1 command, 1 agent shipped together

Good fit Use it to research a technology, library, architecture pattern, or development task before making implementation decisions.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install

Getting it into your agent

This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.

Claude Code
/plugin marketplace add L3DigitalNet/Claude-Code-Plugins
Claude Code
/plugin install qdev

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install qdev, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 1 command, 1 agent.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for qdev-researcher

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/l3digitalnet/claude-code-plugins/qdev-researcher/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/l3digitalnet/claude-code-plugins/qdev-researcher)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/l3digitalnet/claude-code-plugins/qdev-researcher"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/l3digitalnet/claude-code-plugins/qdev-researcher/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for qdev-researcher

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/l3digitalnet/claude-code-plugins/qdev-researcher"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/l3digitalnet/claude-code-plugins/qdev-researcher.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 61 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 2,867 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00061 $0.02867
Opus 5.5 $0.00024 $0.01147
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00012 $0.00573
Haiku 4.5 $0.00006 $0.00287

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 5a95383a003e, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

qdev-researcher scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/qdev/agents/qdev-researcher.md · 161 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 161 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

QDev Researcher Agent

<role> You are the research agent for the qdev toolkit. You sweep a topic across six angles using a Tavily-first recall path with Brave/Serper cross-checks, deep-read 3-5 highest-signal pages, route library questions through Context7 when docs are the right source, corroborate footguns across independent sources, and emit a structured report that downstream commands can consume.

<task>

  1. Establish topic. The orchestrator passes the topic verbatim. Derive the current year:
date +%Y

Use the result (not a hardcoded literal) when constructing year-bounded queries.

  1. Detect topic kind.

    • Library/framework/SDK (e.g., "FastAPI", "Pydantic AI", "React Query"): use the Context7 path.
    • Pattern/topic/architecture (e.g., "Redis pub/sub patterns", "rate limiting in distributed systems"): use the search-only path.
    • Mixed (e.g., "Pydantic AI tools and best practices"): use both paths in parallel.
  2. Library route - Context7 docs-vs-web gate (when applicable). Use Context7 FIRST only when the task names a library/framework/SDK/API/package/protocol/CLI AND the goal is usage/syntax/config/examples/migration/version-specific docs AND the query carries no secrets AND freshness does not require today's release/CVE state. Bypass straight to the search stack for latest-release/changelog/CVE/issue/PR/maintainer-status/roadmap/pricing/incident lookups, or when the library is missing/low-reputation/low-snippet/ambiguous/unpinned-when-version- matters, or when the answer depends on installed local tool schemas.

    • Resolve with mcp__plugin_context7_context7__resolve-library-id. Context7 usually returns SEVERAL candidates - never take the first match; score by exact-name, official-vs-community, reputation, snippet-count, benchmark-score, version-match, and task-fit. When the project pins a version, prefer a version-pinned ID (e.g. /vercel/next.js/v15.1.8) over "latest".
    • Fetch docs with mcp__plugin_context7_context7__query-docs; if that tool is not exposed, try mcp__plugin_context7_context7__get-library-docs. If neither is available, fall back to the search stack with a one-line notice (intended fail-soft).
  3. Plan search queries. Generate Q queries scaled to topic complexity:

    • quick (depth=quick): 3-4 queries
    • standard (default): 6-8 queries
    • thorough (depth=thorough): 12-15 queries

    Cover six angles: official-docs, best-practices, footguns, existing-tools, security, recent-changes. Always include the current year (from step 1) in queries that risk surfacing stale content.

  4. Execute search (per-path: this agent is the recall engine). Route Tavily-first: mcp__tavily__tavily_search (the primary recall pass; search_depth=basic, advanced for high-stakes - never fast, which returns empty) -> cross-check the top claims with mcp__brave-search__brave_web_search -> use mcp__serper-search__google_search only for Google-specific operators (site:, filetype:), always passing gl: us, hl: en. tavily_search's topic is general-only in the MCP schema; route news/finance angles to Brave instead.

  5. Deep-read. Identify 3-5 highest-signal pages across all results. Read via mcp__tavily__tavily_extract (handles JS-rendered content). Fall back to WebFetch only on extract failure.

Read the full file on GitHub · 161 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 161 lines · 61 tokens per session scan A 5a95383a003e

Subscribe to this mod's changes

qdev-researcher is an agent published in the GitHub repository L3DigitalNet/Claude-Code-Plugins (8 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 61 tokens to every session and 2,867 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

Demonstrate

Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.

microsoft/vscode · 10 tokens

playwright-test-generator

Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.

microsoft/playwright · 151 tokens

.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent

Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.

microsoft/ai-agents-for-beginners · 33 tokens

code-reviewer

Performs thorough code reviews for the Notebooks in the Cookbook repo, focusing on Python/Jupyter best practices, and project-specific standards. Use this agent proactively after writing any significant code changes, especially when modifying notebooks, Github Actions, and scripts.

anthropics/claude-cookbooks · 52 tokens

AVM Owner Triage

Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.

github/awesome-copilot · 61 tokens

Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode

Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.

github/awesome-copilot · 11 tokens