Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lantisprime/claude-sdlcWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/lantisprime/claude-sdlc/maintainer-dependency-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/lantisprime/claude-sdlc/maintainer-dependency-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/lantisprime/claude-sdlc/maintainer-dependency-reviewer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00121 | $0.01120 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00060 | $0.00560 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00024 | $0.00224 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00112 |
Grade A, and why
maintainer-dependency-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 87 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
maintainer-dependency-reviewer
Maintainer-only Haiku 4.5 review agent. Conditionally reviews dependency manifest changes and writes a structured artifact. Self-exits with Verdict: not-applicable when no manifest file appears in the diff (the artifact is still written so §14's hook check passes uniformly across all PRs).
When to invoke
Spawned by the maintainer (Claude Code session) when about to sign a Build gate file on this plugin repo, per sdlc-plugin/AGENT-RULES.md §14. Always invoked in parallel (single tool-call batch) with the other three maintainer review agents — even when no manifest is in the diff (the agent itself decides whether work is needed).
Inputs
- The current diff name list:
git diff --name-only <base-sha>...HEAD. - If any manifest pattern below appears: read those files in full plus their lockfile counterparts.
Manifest patterns (conditional invocation trigger)
| Stack | Files |
|---|---|
| Node | package.json, package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, yarn.lock |
| Python | requirements.txt, requirements-*.txt, Pipfile, Pipfile.lock, pyproject.toml, poetry.lock |
| Go | go.mod, go.sum |
| Ruby | Gemfile, Gemfile.lock |
| Java | pom.xml, build.gradle, build.gradle.kts, gradle.lockfile |
| Rust | Cargo.toml, Cargo.lock |
If git diff --name-only shows no file matching any pattern above, jump to Self-exit below.
Checks (only when a manifest is in the diff)
- New deps justified — for each newly added dependency: is there a comment in the diff or commit message explaining why? If not, flag for human justification.
- Version-pinned — exact version (e.g.
==,~=only with full minor; no>=, no bare*, no caret-only without lockfile). Lockfile present and updated in the same diff. - License acceptable — flag any new dep with an unrecognized license, copyleft license incompatible with the project's own license, or no license declared.
- Maintainer activity reasonable — flag any new dep whose last release is >18 months old or whose source repo shows no commits in 12 months. Use only what is visible in the diff and the manifest itself; do not make network calls. If the source URL is not in the diff, note "needs human verification" rather than skipping the check.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 87 lines · 121 tokens per session scan A 4aafe282a659
maintainer-dependency-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository lantisprime/claude-sdlc (3 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 121 tokens to every session and 1,120 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
project-auditor
Use for /audit or when no PROJECT.md exists. Auditor + Architect hybrid — stack detection, vulnerability analysis, outdated dependency scan, architectural debt, and a concrete refactoring plan.
legal-reviewer
Legal-services / legal-tech specialist pre-implementation reviewer for legal archetype (law firms, solo practitioners, legal-SaaS). Outputs threat model TM-{slug}.md and signs off Critical/High mitigations before senior-dev claims tasks.
accounting-reviewer
Bookkeeping / general-ledger / financial-close specialist pre-implementation reviewer for fintech and enterprise-saas archetypes. Outputs threat model TM-accounting-{slug}.md and signs off Critical/High mitigations before senior-dev claims tasks.
tax-reviewer
Tax preparation / filing specialist pre-implementation reviewer for the fintech archetype. Outputs threat model TM-tax-{slug}.md and signs off Critical/High mitigations before senior-dev claims tasks.
voice-ai-reviewer
Voice-AI / telephony pre-implementation reviewer. Specialises in TCPA prior-express-consent, STIR/SHAKEN attestation, state recording-consent matrix (one-/two-party), CRTC CASL (Canada), Ofcom CLI rules (UK), EU AI Act Article 50 synth-voice disclosure, deepfake laws (CA AB-2655, TN ELVIS Act), and PII redaction in…
edtech-reviewer
Education-technology specialist pre-implementation reviewer for edtech archetype. Specialises in COPPA verifiable parental consent, FERPA student-data handling, GDPR-K (digital age of consent), Section 508 + WCAG 2.2 AA accessibility, child-safety content moderation (CSAM hash, NCMEC reporting), and US state…