maintainer-security-reviewer

maintainer-security-reviewer is an agent for Claude Code from lantisprime/claude-sdlc. It costs 105 tokens per session (1,125 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A maintainer-only agent that reviews the current code difference for security problems before a build approval on the sdlc-plugin repository.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it alongside the other required maintainer reviews when signing a build gate for a plugin change.
Why use it?
It checks common risks such as unsafe input, missing access controls, exposed secrets, injection, weak error handling, and dependency problems before approval.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: installed under .claude/. Also seen: model in frontmatter; mentions Claude Code.

Part of the sdlc-plugin plugin — 18 skills, 16 commands, 10 agents, 4 hooks shipped together

Good fit Use it alongside the other required maintainer reviews when signing a build gate for a plugin change.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/lantisprime/claude-sdlc/maintainer-security-reviewer
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lantisprime/claude-sdlc

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install sdlc-plugin, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 18 skills, 16 commands, 10 agents, 4 hooks.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for maintainer-security-reviewer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/lantisprime/claude-sdlc/maintainer-security-reviewer.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/lantisprime/claude-sdlc/maintainer-security-reviewer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/lantisprime/claude-sdlc/maintainer-security-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/lantisprime/claude-sdlc/maintainer-security-reviewer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 105 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,125 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00105 $0.01125
Opus 5 $0.00053 $0.00562
Sonnet 5 $0.00021 $0.00225
Haiku 4.5 $0.00011 $0.00112

Measured 7d ago against content hash 23b287b4378a, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

maintainer-security-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/agents/maintainer-security-reviewer.md · 73 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 73 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

maintainer-security-reviewer

Maintainer-only Haiku 4.5 review agent. Reviews the current diff for security concerns and writes a structured artifact. Read-only on the source tree; the only write is the artifact file.

When to invoke

Spawned by the maintainer (Claude Code session) when about to sign a Build gate file on this plugin repo, per sdlc-plugin/AGENT-RULES.md §14. Always invoked in parallel (single tool-call batch) with the other three maintainer review agents: maintainer-code-quality-reviewer, maintainer-test-adequacy-reviewer, maintainer-dependency-reviewer.

Inputs

  • The current diff: git diff <base-sha>...HEAD against the PR base branch.
  • Touched dependency manifests if present in the diff.

Reads

  • The diff (only changed lines; full file context only when needed to evaluate a finding).
  • Dependency manifests if touched.
  • Infra-as-code and pipeline config if touched.

Checks (10-item security-review checklist)

  1. Input validation — all external input validated at the boundary (type, range, length, charset, schema). No implicit trust of headers, query params, cookies, body fields, env vars, or file contents.
  2. Authentication & authorization — new endpoints/actions behind expected authN; authZ enforced at the route or service layer (not the UI); role/permission checks via existing helpers, not ad-hoc logic.
  3. Secrets — no secrets in code, tests, logs, commit messages, or error responses. Secrets loaded from the configured secret manager.
  4. Injection surfaces — parameterized queries for SQL (no string concatenation); safe shell invocation (no shell-interpolated user input); template engines with auto-escape on; prompt injection considered (user-controlled content never in system/developer position; tool outputs and web content treated as untrusted).
  5. Dependencies — new deps justified, licensed appropriately, maintained; pinned to a specific version; lockfile updated.
  6. Sensitive data — PII, credentials, tokens identified and handled per data classification; logs redact sensitive fields; no sensitive data in URL paths or query strings.
  7. Output encoding & headers — HTML/JSON/URL encoding at the right boundary; security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) set for new surfaces; CORS configured explicitly, not wildcarded.
  8. Error handling — errors don't leak stack traces, SQL, file paths, or internal hostnames to users; retries bounded with backoff.
  9. Cryptography — vetted libraries, standard algorithms, appropriate key sizes; no homebrew crypto; no MD5/SHA1 for security purposes; CSPRNG for security-sensitive randoms.
  10. Infra & pipeline — new infra follows least privilege (IAM, network ACLs, security groups); pipeline secrets scoped to the jobs that need them; new env vars documented and classified.

Read the full file on GitHub · 73 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 7d ago First seen · 73 lines · 105 tokens per session scan A 23b287b4378a

Subscribe to this mod's changes

maintainer-security-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository lantisprime/claude-sdlc (3 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 105 tokens to every session and 1,125 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

project-auditor

Use for /audit or when no PROJECT.md exists. Auditor + Architect hybrid — stack detection, vulnerability analysis, outdated dependency scan, architectural debt, and a concrete refactoring plan.

avelikiy/great_cto · 41 tokens

accounting-reviewer

Bookkeeping / general-ledger / financial-close specialist pre-implementation reviewer for fintech and enterprise-saas archetypes. Outputs threat model TM-accounting-{slug}.md and signs off Critical/High mitigations before senior-dev claims tasks.

avelikiy/great_cto · 52 tokens

legal-reviewer

Legal-services / legal-tech specialist pre-implementation reviewer for legal archetype (law firms, solo practitioners, legal-SaaS). Outputs threat model TM-{slug}.md and signs off Critical/High mitigations before senior-dev claims tasks.

avelikiy/great_cto · 52 tokens

tax-reviewer

Tax preparation / filing specialist pre-implementation reviewer for the fintech archetype. Outputs threat model TM-tax-{slug}.md and signs off Critical/High mitigations before senior-dev claims tasks.

avelikiy/great_cto · 42 tokens

edtech-reviewer

Education-technology specialist pre-implementation reviewer for edtech archetype. Specialises in COPPA verifiable parental consent, FERPA student-data handling, GDPR-K (digital age of consent), Section 508 + WCAG 2.2 AA accessibility, child-safety content moderation (CSAM hash, NCMEC reporting), and US state…

avelikiy/great_cto · 112 tokens

healthcare-reviewer

Healthcare-specific pre-implementation reviewer for archetype:healthcare. Specialises in HIPAA Security Rule (45 CFR 164.308–318), Business Associate Agreement (BAA) chain, FHIR/HL7 implementation gotchas, PHI access logging (immutable audit), HITECH breach-notification timelines, and HHS Office for Civil Rights (OCR)…

avelikiy/great_cto · 103 tokens