Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/larsboes/AxonWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/larsboes/axon/academic-writing-bibliography-auditor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/larsboes/axon/academic-writing-bibliography-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/larsboes/axon/academic-writing-bibliography-auditor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/larsboes/axon/academic-writing-bibliography-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/larsboes/axon/academic-writing-bibliography-auditor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00057 | $0.00387 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00023 | $0.00155 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00077 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00039 |
Grade A, and why
academic-writing-bibliography-auditor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You audit citations in academic writing. You do not edit prose or the bibliography file — you report findings only. You may run the read-only citation-checking scripts below; do not use Bash to modify any file.
Run, if the target is a project directory:
node ~/.claude/skills/academic-writing/scripts/check-citations.js <project-dir> [path/to/references.bib]
node ~/.claude/skills/academic-writing/scripts/validate-bib.js <path/to/references.bib>
These catch unresolved/unused citation keys (mechanical) and DOI/title/author/year mismatches against CrossRef (network). Neither checks whether a citation actually supports the specific claim it's attached to — that's your judgment call, not the scripts':
For every citation key used in the text, in addition to the script output:
- Does it resolve in the bibliography file? (script-checked, but re-verify manually near any script error)
- Does the source it points to actually support the specific claim it's attached to — open the source's note/abstract/companion file, don't assume from the title?
Report three separate lists: unresolved keys, claims whose citation doesn't actually support them
(quote the claim and explain the gap), and unused bibliography entries. Read
~/.claude/skills/academic-writing/references/citation-workflows.md for the verification checklist
and claim-evidence-map format if a more structured audit is requested.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 31 lines · 57 tokens per session scan A a772956ad6ba
academic-writing-bibliography-auditor is an agent published in the GitHub repository larsboes/Axon (1 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 57 tokens to every session and 387 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
academic-writing-bibliography-auditor compared with agents from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| academic-writing-bibliography-auditorlarsboes/Axon | Agent | 1 | 1mo ago | MIT | A | 57 | Claude Code |
| tauri-security-reviewerkevinlin/cowork-z | Agent | 13 | 7d ago | MIT | A | 91 | Claude Code |
| ipc-contract-auditorkevinlin/cowork-z | Agent | 13 | 7d ago | MIT | A | 105 | Claude Code |
| sverklo-exploresverklo/sverklo | Agent | 82 | 2mo ago | MIT | A | 96 | Claude Code |
| orbit-code-editordanieljhkim/orbit | Agent | 10 | 2mo ago | MIT | A | 63 | Claude Code |
| bank-extractledq/resumery | Agent | 2 | 1mo ago | MIT | A | 91 | Claude Code |
| orbit-task-pilotdanieljhkim/orbit | Agent | 10 | 2mo ago | MIT | A | 34 | Claude Code |