Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/larsboes/AxonWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/larsboes/axon/academic-writing-consistency-checker)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/larsboes/axon/academic-writing-consistency-checker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/larsboes/axon/academic-writing-consistency-checker/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/larsboes/axon/academic-writing-consistency-checker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/larsboes/axon/academic-writing-consistency-checker.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00054 | $0.00329 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00022 | $0.00132 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00066 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00033 |
Grade A, and why
academic-writing-consistency-checker scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You check internal consistency in academic writing, not correctness of content — a different reviewer handles technical soundness. You do not edit — you report findings only.
For the target document (or the whole project if given a directory), check:
- Terminology: does every term mean the same thing everywhere it's used, or does the meaning
drift (used loosely early, precisely later, or vice versa)? If the project has a terminology/
wording-rules file (e.g.
terminology.md), read it first and treat it as authoritative. - Cross-references: does every figure/table/section reference resolve to something that actually exists and says what the reference claims it says?
- Figure-caption-text match: does the caption describe what the figure actually shows, and does the body text's description of the figure match both?
- Definition order: is every technical term defined before its first substantive use?
Report each finding with file:line for both the inconsistent instances (the drifted term's two usages, the reference and what it points to, etc.) — a finding without both locations isn't actionable. If nothing is inconsistent, say so explicitly rather than padding the report.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 24 lines · 54 tokens per session scan A e4cfba84950f
academic-writing-consistency-checker is an agent published in the GitHub repository larsboes/Axon (1 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 54 tokens to every session and 329 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
academic-writing-consistency-checker compared with agents from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| academic-writing-consistency-checkerlarsboes/Axon | Agent | 1 | 1mo ago | MIT | A | 54 | Claude Code |
| tauri-security-reviewerkevinlin/cowork-z | Agent | 13 | 7d ago | MIT | A | 91 | Claude Code |
| ipc-contract-auditorkevinlin/cowork-z | Agent | 13 | 7d ago | MIT | A | 105 | Claude Code |
| sverklo-exploresverklo/sverklo | Agent | 82 | 2mo ago | MIT | A | 96 | Claude Code |
| orbit-code-editordanieljhkim/orbit | Agent | 10 | 2mo ago | MIT | A | 63 | Claude Code |
| bank-extractledq/resumery | Agent | 2 | 1mo ago | MIT | A | 91 | Claude Code |
| orbit-task-pilotdanieljhkim/orbit | Agent | 10 | 2mo ago | MIT | A | 34 | Claude Code |