academic-writing-consistency-checker

academic-writing-consistency-checker is an agent for Claude Code from larsboes/Axon. It costs 54 tokens per session (329 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A reviewer for internal consistency in academic papers and theses. It checks whether terminology, references, definitions, figure captions, and the surrounding text agree with one another, but it does not check whether the research itself is correct.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it after substantial edits to report terminology changes, unresolved figure or section references, caption mismatches, and technical terms introduced too late.
Why use it?
It finds contradictions and broken links between sections after documents have been edited in several places.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin. Also seen: model in frontmatter.

Part of the writing plugin — 5 skills, 8 agents shipped together

Good fit Use it after substantial edits to report terminology changes, unresolved figure or section references, caption mismatches, and technical terms introduced too late.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/larsboes/axon/academic-writing-consistency-checker
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/larsboes/Axon

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install writing, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 5 skills, 8 agents.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for academic-writing-consistency-checker

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/larsboes/axon/academic-writing-consistency-checker/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/larsboes/axon/academic-writing-consistency-checker)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/larsboes/axon/academic-writing-consistency-checker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/larsboes/axon/academic-writing-consistency-checker/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for academic-writing-consistency-checker

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/larsboes/axon/academic-writing-consistency-checker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/larsboes/axon/academic-writing-consistency-checker.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 54 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 329 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00054 $0.00329
Opus 5.5 $0.00022 $0.00132
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00011 $0.00066
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00033

Measured 2mo ago against content hash e4cfba84950f, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

academic-writing-consistency-checker scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Packs/writing/agents/academic-writing-consistency-checker.md · 24 lines

What it actually says

You check internal consistency in academic writing, not correctness of content — a different reviewer handles technical soundness. You do not edit — you report findings only.

For the target document (or the whole project if given a directory), check:

  1. Terminology: does every term mean the same thing everywhere it's used, or does the meaning drift (used loosely early, precisely later, or vice versa)? If the project has a terminology/ wording-rules file (e.g. terminology.md), read it first and treat it as authoritative.
  2. Cross-references: does every figure/table/section reference resolve to something that actually exists and says what the reference claims it says?
  3. Figure-caption-text match: does the caption describe what the figure actually shows, and does the body text's description of the figure match both?
  4. Definition order: is every technical term defined before its first substantive use?

Report each finding with file:line for both the inconsistent instances (the drifted term's two usages, the reference and what it points to, etc.) — a finding without both locations isn't actionable. If nothing is inconsistent, say so explicitly rather than padding the report.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2mo ago First seen · 24 lines · 54 tokens per session scan A e4cfba84950f

Subscribe to this mod's changes

academic-writing-consistency-checker is an agent published in the GitHub repository larsboes/Axon (1 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 54 tokens to every session and 329 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

academic-writing-consistency-checker compared with agents from other repositories

academic-writing-consistency-checker next to 6 agents from other repositories
ModTypeStarsLast pushLicenceScanTokensWorks with
academic-writing-consistency-checkerlarsboes/AxonAgent11mo agoMITA54Claude Code
tauri-security-reviewerkevinlin/cowork-zAgent137d agoMITA91Claude Code
ipc-contract-auditorkevinlin/cowork-zAgent137d agoMITA105Claude Code
sverklo-exploresverklo/sverkloAgent822mo agoMITA96Claude Code
orbit-code-editordanieljhkim/orbitAgent102mo agoMITA63Claude Code
bank-extractledq/resumeryAgent21mo agoMITA91Claude Code
orbit-task-pilotdanieljhkim/orbitAgent102mo agoMITA34Claude Code