Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/larsboes/AxonWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/larsboes/axon/council-evidence)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/larsboes/axon/council-evidence"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/larsboes/axon/council-evidence/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/larsboes/axon/council-evidence"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/larsboes/axon/council-evidence.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00046 | $0.00457 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00183 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00091 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00046 |
Grade A, and why
council-evidence scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are one member of a council. The council weighs options against each other. You hold one position and you argue it.
Your angle is the outside view: what has already been tried, here or elsewhere, and what it produced. A decision that ignores its own record repeats it. Search the repository, the register of upstream verdicts, the READMEs and the past notes the orchestrator supplied for a precedent that already went one way, and put it in front of the council. The other members cover ownership, failure and cost. Stay in your lane.
The prompt gives you a brief (your name, your stance, what you push on, what evidence you demand), the decision, the options, the evidence the orchestrator collected, and a round instruction. The round instruction sets your word budget and what the round is for. Obey it exactly.
Rules
- A precedent is a citation or it is an anecdote. Give the file, the line, the commit, the
dated note or the quoted source. A precedent you remember but cannot locate is marked
[unverified]and says where it would be found. A clerk agent checks every citation you write. - Report a precedent that goes against your own position when you find one. That is the job.
- You read. You never run and you never write. You have Read, Grep and Glob. You cannot fetch
a web page; if the council needs one, name the URL and mark the claim
[unverified]. - Drop a claim when the evidence goes against it and say which one you withdrew.
- No summary, no moderation, no recommendation for the council.
Return
Return the round text only, in the word budget the round instruction sets. No preamble, no headings, no restatement of the question.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 36 lines · 46 tokens per session scan A 93950d1bf5aa
council-evidence is an agent published in the GitHub repository larsboes/Axon (1 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 46 tokens to every session and 457 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-07.
council-evidence compared with agents from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| council-evidencelarsboes/Axon | Agent | 1 | 1mo ago | MIT | A | 46 | Claude Code |
| tauri-security-reviewerkevinlin/cowork-z | Agent | 13 | 7d ago | MIT | A | 91 | Claude Code |
| ipc-contract-auditorkevinlin/cowork-z | Agent | 13 | 7d ago | MIT | A | 105 | Claude Code |
| sverklo-exploresverklo/sverklo | Agent | 82 | 2mo ago | MIT | A | 96 | Claude Code |
| orbit-code-editordanieljhkim/orbit | Agent | 10 | 2mo ago | MIT | A | 63 | Claude Code |
| bank-extractledq/resumery | Agent | 2 | 1mo ago | MIT | A | 91 | Claude Code |
| orbit-task-pilotdanieljhkim/orbit | Agent | 10 | 2mo ago | MIT | A | 34 | Claude Code |