Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/LcpMarvel/feishu-whiteboard-proWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/lcpmarvel/feishu-whiteboard-pro/whiteboard-finish-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/lcpmarvel/feishu-whiteboard-pro/whiteboard-finish-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/lcpmarvel/feishu-whiteboard-pro/whiteboard-finish-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/lcpmarvel/feishu-whiteboard-pro/whiteboard-finish-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/lcpmarvel/feishu-whiteboard-pro/whiteboard-finish-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00038 | $0.00830 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00415 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00166 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00083 |
Grade A, and why
whiteboard-finish-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 102 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A 7845d367586d
whiteboard-finish-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository LcpMarvel/feishu-whiteboard-pro (58 stars, last pushed 12d ago), with no licence file. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 830 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
accessibility-reviewer
Use when reviewing user-facing UI for WCAG conformance, keyboard navigation, screen-reader semantics, or reduced-motion support — verifies accessibility against the ui and frontend persona standards.
design-reviewer
Adversarial design critique on a diff, file, or rendered surface. Use to review UI/design quality or audit a diff/PR for design issues. One of a parallel verify team alongside a11y-auditor.
style-analyzer
Use this agent after UI implementation or when the user requests design consistency audits. Ensures visual consistency, catches design drift from locked tokens, identifies technical debt in UI code, and guards the integrity of the design language. Context: Multiple UI components were built during the cycle. user…
mb-reviewer
Code review agent for /mb work review-loop. Reads stage diff + pipeline.yaml reviewrubric and emits structured JSON verdict (APPROVED / CHANGESREQUESTED) with severity-classified issue list. Drives the severity-gate decision.
review-ui-ux
A review agent for user interfaces, the parts of software people see and operate. It checks accessibility, keyboard use, design consistency, wording, and responsive behavior, or gives design advice before implementation.
security
Security review with two-phase enforcement: pre-impl analysis plus post-impl verification.