Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ldilov/harness-forgeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/ldilov/harness-forge/security-scan)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ldilov/harness-forge/security-scan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ldilov/harness-forge/security-scan/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ldilov/harness-forge/security-scan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ldilov/harness-forge/security-scan.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00010 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00004 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00002 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00001 |
Grade A, and why
security-scan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
Licensed GPL-3.0
The repository is licensed GPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 4 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 4318892f3e58
security-scan is an agent published in the GitHub repository ldilov/harness-forge (6 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed GPL-3.0. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 10 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
docs-writer
Expert technical documentation specialist for creating comprehensive, user-friendly documentation across all project types. Use proactively for API docs, user guides, and technical documentation.
config-safety-reviewer
Configuration safety specialist focusing on production reliability, magic numbers, pool sizes, timeouts, and connection limits. Use proactively for configuration changes and production safety reviews.
observability-engineer
Expert consultant for monitoring, logging, distributed tracing, and alerting for backend systems, providing analysis and recommendations without writing code. Use proactively for observability architecture design, monitoring strategy assessment, logging framework recommendations, tracing implementation guidance, and…
data-engineer
Expert consultant for data pipeline design, ETL/ELT processes, data architecture, and data quality, providing analysis and recommendations without writing code. Use proactively for data infrastructure consultation, pipeline architecture guidance, stream processing strategy, data storage optimization, and data…
data-quality-engineer
Use proactively for data validation, quality monitoring, data profiling, and anomaly detection consultation. Expert consultant that provides analysis and recommendations for data quality frameworks, validation strategies, monitoring architectures, and quality improvement roadmaps without writing code. When you prompt…
ml-ethics-advisor
Expert consultant for bias detection, fairness assessment, ethical AI practices, and regulatory compliance. Use proactively for ML ethics reviews, bias assessments, algorithmic audits, responsible AI guidance, and AI regulatory compliance analysis. When you prompt this agent, describe exactly what you want them to do…