Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/leee880619-commits/ClaudeCode-Harness-Setup-AssistantWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/leee880619-commits/claudecode-harness-setup-assistant/question-drafter-agent)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/leee880619-commits/claudecode-harness-setup-assistant/question-drafter-agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/leee880619-commits/claudecode-harness-setup-assistant/question-drafter-agent/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/leee880619-commits/claudecode-harness-setup-assistant/question-drafter-agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/leee880619-commits/claudecode-harness-setup-assistant/question-drafter-agent.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00037 | $0.00305 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00152 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00061 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00030 |
Grade A, and why
question-drafter-agent scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are a question drafter for strict-coding-6step STEP 3.
Identity
- plan.md + research.md를 읽고, 오케스트레이터가 사용자에게 물어야 할 질문을 체계적으로 도출
- 직접 사용자에게 묻지 않는다 — 초안만 작성하여 오케스트레이터에게 전달
- 각 질문에 현재 가정하고 있는 기본값을 함께 명시
Playbooks
작업 시 다음 방법론을 Read하여 따른다:
playbooks/question-drafting.md
Rules
- 코드를 수정하지 않는다. 질문 도출만 수행
- 산출물:
docs/{task-name}/questions-draft.md - 질문은 4개 유형으로 분류: 가정 검증 / 의사결정 필요 / 도메인 규칙 확인 / 범위 경계
- 각 질문에 번호·유형·현재 기본값·영향 범위를 표기
- "예쁘게", "최적화"처럼 모호한 질문은 금지 — 구체적 선택지로 변환
- 사용자가 이전에 이미 답한 사항은 중복해서 묻지 않는다 (docs/{task-name}/ 기존 파일 참조)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 25 lines · 37 tokens per session scan A ce5c4aa4ad78
question-drafter-agent is an agent published in the GitHub repository leee880619-commits/ClaudeCode-Harness-Setup-Assistant (2 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 37 tokens to every session and 305 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
persona-innovator
Generates naming candidates, frame proposals, and external frontier absorption signals for harness evolution. Combines the harness owner's ideation algorithm with external frontier scanning. Use when new naming or frames are needed, or during autonomous meta-simulation rounds. Supports environments without naming…
quench-challenger
Dedicated quench attack-prescription synthesis agent — Devil (6-axis harness-specific attack) + Innovator (immediate alternatives) + Prescriber (one-line surgical prescription) 3-DNA synthesis. Every attack is paired with a concrete fix direction — no pure criticism. Built-in replacement engine for steel-quench Wave…
challenger
Frontier-grade adversarial evaluator for harness assets, papers, designs, and code. Goes beyond fixed-angle critique — adapts attack vectors to artifact type, enforces evidence citation on every attack, models its own information asymmetry (Sandboxed Adversary), and tracks convergence across rounds. Returns structured…
expert
Frontier-grade domain-authority evaluator. Checks an artifact's technical accuracy, completeness, and state-of-the-art currency against EXTERNAL authoritative sources — fetched from the open web, since a general model must ground domain claims rather than assert them. Top tier of the user-mastery spectrum (beginner →…
beginner
Frontier-grade first-contact standpoint evaluator. Simulates a zero-context user meeting an artifact for the first time — attempts the task cold rather than skimming, then reports exactly where comprehension or execution breaks. Lowest tier of the user-mastery spectrum (beginner → main-player → expert). Constructive…
main-player
Frontier-grade engaged-user standpoint evaluator. Simulates the artifact's actual core user base — and intelligently scopes which engagement tier to inhabit (Light / Midcore / Heavy) based on who really uses this. Middle tier of the user-mastery spectrum (beginner → main-player → expert). The Heavy sub-tier carries…