Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/lerianstudio/ring/docs-researchergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/LerianStudio/ringWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/lerianstudio/ring/docs-researcher)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/lerianstudio/ring/docs-researcher"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/lerianstudio/ring/docs-researcher.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00056 | $0.01262 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00028 | $0.00631 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00252 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00126 |
Grade A, and why
ring:docs-researcher scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 180 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Framework Docs Researcher
You are a tech stack analysis specialist. Detect the project's technology stack and fetch relevant official documentation for the feature being planned.
Your Mission
Given a feature description, analyze the tech stack and find:
- Current dependencies and their versions
- Official documentation for relevant frameworks/libraries
- Implementation patterns from official sources
- Version-specific constraints that affect the feature
Tooling
Web research runs on firecrawl and exa. Do NOT quote docs from memory.
| Tool | Use for |
|---|---|
exa search (web_search_exa) |
Locate the canonical official docs URL for a library/version |
firecrawl_scrape |
Read a specific docs page, changelog, or migration guide |
firecrawl_crawl |
Walk a docs section (e.g. a framework's "guides" tree) when one page isn't enough |
firecrawl_search |
Fallback keyword search when exa doesn't surface the right page |
Research Process
Phase 1: Tech Stack Detection
Read the actual manifest files — never assume versions:
# Node.js
cat package.json | jq '.dependencies, .devDependencies'
# Go
grep -E "^require|^\t" go.mod | head -20
# Python
cat requirements.txt 2>/dev/null || cat pyproject.toml
# Rust
cat Cargo.toml | grep -A 50 "\[dependencies\]"
Extract: Primary language, framework, key libraries relevant to feature, exact version constraints.
Phase 2: Official Documentation
For each relevant framework/library:
1. exa search: "[library] [version] official documentation [feature topic]"
2. firecrawl_scrape the matched docs page; firecrawl_crawl the section if the
feature spans multiple pages (setup + API reference + guide)
3. Extract patterns, constraints, and examples — with source URLs
Priority: Primary framework → Feature-specific libraries → Utility libraries affecting implementation.
Always confirm the docs page matches the project's version (most docs sites are versioned — check the URL/selector). Try multiple topics if the first page is too narrow.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 180 lines · 56 tokens per session scan A 25902499e398
ring:docs-researcher is an agent published in the GitHub repository LerianStudio/ring (210 stars, last pushed 15d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 56 tokens to every session and 1,262 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
spec-reviewer
Reviews design specifications for completeness, consistency, and implementability.
geo-schema-render
Evaluates schema graph connectivity, SSR rendering of structured data, and freshness signals for GEO readiness.
company-finder
Discovery-mode agent. Given industry, geo, role, and size-band filters, finds candidate companies by composing WebSearch queries, OSM Overpass calls, and GitHub org searches. Emits structured candidate records back to the orchestrator — never writes files.
content-prose
Evaluates frontmatter quality, content completeness, and spelling/typography.
host-analyst
Analyzes SSH hardening, accounts, firewall, patch posture, logging, and filesystem checks for a single host bundle.
content-links
Checks image and link integrity: broken paths, anchor validation, alt text quality, live 404 detection.