reviewer

reviewer is an agent for Claude Code, Gemini CLI from LF-Decentralized-Trust-labs/gitmesh. It costs 0 tokens per session (3 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

An agent named "Reviewer" from GitMesh, a project for coordinating open-source AI agents with rules written as code.

In plain words
What is it for?
Its concrete jobs are not described in the available information.
Why use it?
The input does not say what the reviewer agent checks or changes.

Agent for Claude CodeGemini CLI

Written for Gemini CLI and Claude Code: installed under .gemini/, but also a Claude Code subagent (agents/*.md).

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/lf-decentralized-trust-labs/gitmesh/reviewer
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/LF-Decentralized-Trust-labs/gitmesh

Made for: Claude Code, Gemini CLI.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for reviewer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/lf-decentralized-trust-labs/gitmesh/reviewer.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/lf-decentralized-trust-labs/gitmesh/reviewer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/lf-decentralized-trust-labs/gitmesh/reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/lf-decentralized-trust-labs/gitmesh/reviewer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 0 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 3 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00000 $0.00003
Opus 5 $0.00000 $0.00002
Sonnet 5 $0.00000 $0.00001
Haiku 4.5 $0.00000 $0.00000

Measured 6d ago against content hash 24cc837d3d38, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-06, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

lib/workspace-adapters/fixtures/antigravity/full-surface/input-repo/.gemini/extensions/deploy/agents/reviewer.md · 2 lines

What it actually says

Reviewer

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 6d ago First seen · 2 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 24cc837d3d38

Subscribe to this mod's changes

reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository LF-Decentralized-Trust-labs/gitmesh (144 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 3 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.