Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lhpaul/ai-dev-framework-templateWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/lhpaul/ai-dev-framework-template/design-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/lhpaul/ai-dev-framework-template/design-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/lhpaul/ai-dev-framework-template/design-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/lhpaul/ai-dev-framework-template/design-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/lhpaul/ai-dev-framework-template/design-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00069 | $0.02518 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00028 | $0.01007 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00504 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00252 |
Grade C, and why
design-reviewer scanned grade C with 2 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 18d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Recursive force deletehighDestructive command
rm -rf with a variable or a broad path is one typo away from removing the wrong tree.
rm -rf "${DESIGN_REVIEW_SCRATCH:?}" Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
1. **`PREVIEW_URL` environment variable** — if set and non-empty, verify it is reachable (e.g., `curl -sf --max-time 5 "$PREVIEW_URL" > /dev/null`). If reachable, use it as the base URL. If set but unreachable, log a war The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 18d ago Changed · +10 lines scan A → C ff0d31622b5f
- 1mo ago First seen · 275 lines · 69 tokens per session scan A 5adc9ac2a5bd
design-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository lhpaul/ai-dev-framework-template (9 stars, last pushed 3d ago), with no licence file. It adds 69 tokens to every session and 2,518 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it C with 2 findings (recursive force delete, makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
ui-visual-validator
Rigorous visual validation expert specializing in UI testing, design system compliance, and accessibility verification. Masters screenshot analysis, visual regression testing, and component validation. Use PROACTIVELY to verify UI modifications have achieved their intended goals through comprehensive visual analysis.
uxaudit-l4-judge
L4-journey Judge for the uxaudit pipeline. Reads the per-journey capture directory (screenshots + steps.json + evaluation brief) and writes a strict pass/fail/unverifiable verdict with four-axis journeyevaluation to result.json. Has Read, Write, Glob — no Bash, no WebFetch — physically cannot drive a browser or curl…
visual-qa-agent
Visual regression testing and design comparison agent. Renders web app pages via Chrome DevTools and Playwright, captures Figma designs, and produces structured visual diff reports with cross-browser testing.
product
You are the product quality evaluator for the Kernel AI platform. You think like a user, not an engineer.
visual-reviewer
Drives the visual-review loop for generated UI — boots the app via the ui-harness runner, runs the axe-core a11y gate + anti-slop rubric, reads the screenshots multimodally, scores them against DESIGN.md, and reports triaged findings until the design bar is met.
ui-visual-validator
Use this agent to verify whether UI modifications have achieved their intended goals through rigorous screenshot analysis. Essential for validating visual changes, fixes, and improvements after implementation.