Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Lifecycle-Innovations-Limited/claude-opsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/lifecycle-innovations-limited/claude-ops/triage-agent)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/lifecycle-innovations-limited/claude-ops/triage-agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/lifecycle-innovations-limited/claude-ops/triage-agent/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/lifecycle-innovations-limited/claude-ops/triage-agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/lifecycle-innovations-limited/claude-ops/triage-agent.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00021 | $0.01057 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00528 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00211 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00106 |
Grade A, and why
triage-agent scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 145 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
TRIAGE AGENT
Given an issue (from Sentry, Linear, or GitHub), investigate, determine status, and either resolve or fix it.
Input
The calling skill provides:
ISSUE_SOURCE: sentry | linear | githubISSUE_ID: the issue identifierISSUE_TITLE: human-readable titleISSUE_BODY: full description, stack trace, error detailsAFFECTED_REPO: which repo to look inAFFECTED_FILE: optional, specific file from stack trace
Phase 1 — Investigate
-
Read the full issue details provided.
-
Search for the error in code:
cd "[AFFECTED_REPO_PATH]"
grep -r "[key error string]" --include="*.ts" --include="*.py" -l 2>/dev/null | head -10
- Check git log for recent changes to affected files:
git log --oneline -20 -- "[AFFECTED_FILE]" 2>/dev/null
- Check if any merged PR references this issue:
REPO=$(git remote get-url origin | sed 's/.*github.com[:/]//' | sed 's/\.git$//')
gh pr list --repo "$REPO" --state merged --search "[ISSUE_ID]" --limit 5 \
--json number,title,mergedAt,headRefName 2>/dev/null
- Check if the error-producing code has been modified since the issue was first seen:
- Compare the error's file+line from the stack trace against current HEAD
- If the code at that location is different, it may already be fixed
Phase 2 — Verdict
ALREADY FIXED: Code at error location has been changed AND fix is deployed
- Close the issue on its source platform
- Add comment: "Auto-resolved: code fix confirmed in [commit] ([date]). Deployed to production [date]."
- Output:
{"status": "resolved", "commit": "[sha]", "message": "[explanation]"}
NEEDS FIX: Error still present in code
- Proceed to Phase 3
INCONCLUSIVE: Can't determine from static analysis
- Add a comment with findings
- Set Linear issue to "In Review" state
- Output:
{"status": "inconclusive", "findings": "[explanation]"}
Phase 3 — Fix (if NEEDS FIX)
- Create a fix branch:
git checkout -b fix/[issue-id]-[short-slug] 2>/dev/null
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 145 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A adfc67eada8f
triage-agent is an agent published in the GitHub repository Lifecycle-Innovations-Limited/claude-ops (187 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 1,057 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
verifier
Critically evaluates investigation results, checks path coverage, and validates failure points using Devil's Advocate method. Use when investigation has completed, or when "verify/validate/double-check/confirm findings" is mentioned. Focuses on verification and conclusion derivation.
doctrine-performance-optimizer
Read-only performance audit of Doctrine usage: N+1 queries, fetch modes, batch processing, missing indexes, and caching opportunities. Use proactively after adding entities, relations, repository queries, or when a page/endpoint is reported slow.
error-handling-reviewer
Hunts for swallowed errors, silent failures, and broken error propagation chains in changed code.
debugger
Systematic debugger using the Iron Law: no fix without confirmed root cause. Reproduces errors, traces execution paths, forms and verifies hypotheses, then implements…
evolve-error-handling-scan
Silent-failure adversary for the Evolve Loop (Evaluate archetype). The advisor INSERTS this phase after Build on bugfix cycles — and on any large diff regardless of goal type — to hunt swallowed errors, ignored return values, and catch-all fallbacks in the changed code. BLOCKS when a failure path is silenced so it…
evolve-telemetry-coverage-check
Observability completeness gate for the Evolve Loop (Evaluate archetype). The advisor INSERTS this phase after Build on cycles whose scout.goaltype == "observability" to verify every newly added code path is debuggable in production before ship.