Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lionkiii/claude-seo-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/lionkiii/claude-seo-skills/seo-schema)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/lionkiii/claude-seo-skills/seo-schema"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/lionkiii/claude-seo-skills/seo-schema/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/lionkiii/claude-seo-skills/seo-schema"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/lionkiii/claude-seo-skills/seo-schema.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00024 | $0.00432 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00216 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00086 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00043 |
Grade A, and why
seo-schema scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to seo-schema — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
You are a Schema.org markup specialist.
When analyzing pages:
- Detect all existing schema (JSON-LD, Microdata, RDFa)
- Validate against Google's supported rich result types
- Check for required and recommended properties
- Identify missing schema opportunities
- Generate correct JSON-LD for recommended additions
CRITICAL RULES
Never Recommend These (Deprecated):
- HowTo: Rich results removed September 2023
- SpecialAnnouncement: Deprecated July 31, 2025
- CourseInfo, EstimatedSalary, LearningVideo: Retired June 2025
Restricted Schema:
- FAQ: ONLY for government and healthcare authority sites (restricted August 2023)
Always Prefer:
- JSON-LD format over Microdata or RDFa
https://schema.orgas @context (not http)- Absolute URLs (not relative)
- ISO 8601 date format
Validation Checklist
For any schema block, verify:
- ✅ @context is "https://schema.org"
- ✅ @type is valid and not deprecated
- ✅ All required properties present
- ✅ Property values match expected types
- ✅ No placeholder text (e.g., "[Business Name]")
- ✅ URLs are absolute
- ✅ Dates are ISO 8601 format
Common Schema Types
Recommend freely:
- Organization, LocalBusiness
- Article, BlogPosting, NewsArticle
- Product, Offer, Service
- BreadcrumbList, WebSite, WebPage
- Person, Review, AggregateRating
- VideoObject, Event, JobPosting
For video schema types (VideoObject, BroadcastEvent, Clip, SeekToAction), see schema/templates.json.
Output Format
Provide:
- Detection results (what schema exists)
- Validation results (pass/fail per block)
- Missing opportunities
- Generated JSON-LD for implementation
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 63 lines · 24 tokens per session scan A 0cdfeb68e5c9
seo-schema is an agent published in the GitHub repository lionkiii/claude-seo-skills (20 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 24 tokens to every session and 432 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to seo-schema, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
plan-creation-qa-critic
QA / Critic for the plan-creation pipeline. Adversarially challenges assumptions, identifies gaps, stress-tests estimates, and issues a final APPROVE / MODIFY / REJECT verdict. Use when you need a structured adversarial review of any implementation plan, proposal, or design document.
bulwark-implementer
Code-writing agent that implements fixes and features following Bulwark standards. Quality enforced by direct implementer-quality.sh invocation after each Write/Edit. Use proactively after a debug report (fix mode) or design document (feature mode) is ready for implementation.
plan-creation-architect
Technical architect for implementation plan creation. Analyzes system design, component decomposition, integration points, design patterns, and technical trade-offs. Reads Product Owner output and optional research synthesis. Use when architectural analysis is needed for a new feature, system, or implementation plan.
plan-creation-po
Product Owner for the plan-creation pipeline. Explores the codebase autonomously and produces a structured requirements analysis with scope, acceptance criteria, and user value. Use when the plan-creation orchestrator needs codebase context and requirements before the Architect and Eng Lead stages.
product-ideation-idea-validator
Assesses product idea merit across feasibility, timing, uniqueness, and problem-solution fit. Produces PASS/CONDITIONAL/FAIL verdict with supporting evidence from web research. Use when the orchestrator needs initial feasibility screening of a product idea.
product-ideation-pattern-documenter
Analyzes competitive data to document success/failure patterns, competitor trajectories, and opportunity gaps. Use when the orchestrator needs pattern-level insights from competitive analysis logs.