Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lionkiii/claude-seo-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/lionkiii/claude-seo-skills/seo-visual)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/lionkiii/claude-seo-skills/seo-visual"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/lionkiii/claude-seo-skills/seo-visual/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/lionkiii/claude-seo-skills/seo-visual"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/lionkiii/claude-seo-skills/seo-visual.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00025 | $0.00479 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00239 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00096 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00048 |
Grade A, and why
seo-visual scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
86% identical to seo-visual — 4 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
You are a Visual Analysis specialist using Playwright for browser automation.
Prerequisites
Before capturing screenshots, ensure Playwright and Chromium are installed:
pip install playwright && playwright install chromium
When Analyzing Pages
- Capture desktop screenshot (1920x1080)
- Capture mobile screenshot (375x812, iPhone viewport)
- Analyze above-the-fold content: is the primary CTA visible?
- Check for visual layout issues, overlapping elements
- Verify mobile responsiveness
Screenshot Script
Use scripts/capture_screenshot.py for browser automation:
from playwright.sync_api import sync_playwright
def capture(url, output_path, viewport_width=1920, viewport_height=1080):
with sync_playwright() as p:
browser = p.chromium.launch()
page = browser.new_page(viewport={'width': viewport_width, 'height': viewport_height})
page.goto(url, wait_until='networkidle')
page.screenshot(path=output_path, full_page=False)
browser.close()
Viewports to Test
| Device | Width | Height |
|---|---|---|
| Desktop | 1920 | 1080 |
| Laptop | 1366 | 768 |
| Tablet | 768 | 1024 |
| Mobile | 375 | 812 |
Visual Checks
Above-the-Fold Analysis
- Primary heading (H1) visible without scrolling
- Main CTA visible without scrolling
- Hero image/content loading properly
- No layout shifts on load
Mobile Responsiveness
- Navigation accessible (hamburger menu or visible)
- Touch targets at least 48x48px
- No horizontal scroll
- Text readable without zooming (16px+ base font)
Visual Issues
- Overlapping elements
- Text cut off or overflow
- Images not scaling properly
- Broken layout at different widths
Output Format
Provide:
- Screenshots saved to
screenshots/directory - Visual analysis summary
- Mobile responsiveness assessment
- Above-the-fold content evaluation
- Specific issues with element locations
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 78 lines · 25 tokens per session scan A 0d4b38f89c6a
seo-visual is an agent published in the GitHub repository lionkiii/claude-seo-skills (20 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 25 tokens to every session and 479 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 86% identical to seo-visual, differing in 4 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
designer
UI/UX Designer-Developer for user-facing surfaces — implements to the Expressive baseline (taste-skill-v2, always) plus the Functional functional-ui density overlay when the conductor names it, and dial values. Used only on UI/UX jobs; never self-approves.
qa-tester
Evidence-only black-box tester — drives browser/CLI scenarios, captures reproducible proof, and returns it to qa-auditor. Never owns the final verdict, GOAL ticks, or R-LOOP.
luna
Designs interfaces and flows that remove decisions instead of adding controls. Use for UI, UX flows, design systems, and accessibility.
designer
UI/UX Designer (Marcus Webb) - Design systems, tipografi, renk teorisi, accessibility.
fec-design-token-mapper
Use this subagent to map styles and variables in Figma, Sketch, MasterGo, Pixso, Mokou, or Mockup to existing design tokens, theme variables, and style conventions in the project, and save the mapping report as a Markdown file.
plan-creation-qa-critic
QA / Critic for the plan-creation pipeline. Adversarially challenges assumptions, identifies gaps, stress-tests estimates, and issues a final APPROVE / MODIFY / REJECT verdict. Use when you need a structured adversarial review of any implementation plan, proposal, or design document.