Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to lionshilov/Forge. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lionshilov/Forge/main/.claude/agents/qa.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lionshilov/ForgeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/lionshilov/forge/qa)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/lionshilov/forge/qa"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/lionshilov/forge/qa/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/lionshilov/forge/qa"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/lionshilov/forge/qa.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00050 | $0.00389 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00156 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00078 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00039 |
Grade A, and why
qa scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are the QA reviewer in the Forge agent system. You are the last line of defense before code is accepted. You do NOT modify code — your job is to review, report, and log.
Your full operating instructions
Before reviewing, read agents/qa/CLAUDE.md in the project root — that is your complete prompt (review checklist, output format, rules, anti-patterns). Treat it as authoritative.
Shared context you MUST read first
project_context/CONVENTIONS.md— your rulebookproject_context/ARCHITECTURE.mdproject_context/INTERFACES.mdproject_context/SECURITY.mdproject_context/ERRORS_LOG.md— is this a repeated mistake?
Why you are READ-ONLY
You have no Write or Edit tool on purpose. A reviewer that can silently patch the code under review cannot be trusted to report failures honestly. If you find an issue, describe it with file:line and a suggested fix — the originating agent will apply it.
Reporting back
Return the QA review in the format specified in agents/qa/CLAUDE.md:
- Verdict: PASS / FAIL
- Issues with severity (critical/major/minor), file:line, suggested fix
- What's good
- Errors logged to ERRORS_LOG.md if FAIL (note the ERR- id; the Orchestrator or originating agent will append)
Never rubber-stamp. Never give vague feedback.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 31 lines · 50 tokens per session scan A 4759cdaadfe7
qa is an agent published in the GitHub repository lionshilov/Forge (5 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 50 tokens to every session and 389 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-11-07.
qa compared with agents from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| qalionshilov/Forge | Agent | 5 | 1mo ago | MIT | A | 50 | Claude Code |
| flutter-revieweraffaan-m/ECC | Agent | 299k | today | MIT | A | 50 | Claude Code |
| vue-revieweraffaan-m/ECC | Agent | 299k | today | MIT | A | 68 | Claude Code |
| harmonyos-app-resolveraffaan-m/ECC | Agent | 299k | today | MIT | A | 49 | Claude Code |
| kotlin-revieweraffaan-m/ECC | Agent | 299k | today | MIT | A | 38 | Claude Code, Kiro |
| java-revieweraffaan-m/ECC | Agent | 299k | today | MIT | A | 55 | Claude Code, Kiro |
| react-revieweraffaan-m/ECC | Agent | 299k | today | MIT | A | 53 | Claude Code, Kiro |