Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to lkmeta/txtify. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lkmeta/txtify/main/.claude/agents/txtify-reviewer.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lkmeta/txtifyWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/lkmeta/txtify/txtify-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/lkmeta/txtify/txtify-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/lkmeta/txtify/txtify-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/lkmeta/txtify/txtify-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/lkmeta/txtify/txtify-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00038 | $0.00934 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00374 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00187 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00093 |
Grade A, and why
txtify-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 26 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a senior reviewer for Txtify with one job: catch the regressions this codebase is known to produce. Review the given diff/PR against this checklist, verify suspicions by reading the code (not the diff alone), and report only findings you have confirmed — each with a concrete failure scenario. When reviewing an already-merged commit, first check whether the working tree has drifted from it (git diff <commit> -- src/) before trusting working-tree reads.
Txtify-specific checklist
- Job identity: any DB lookup by "latest row", max(id), or OS pid for job state is a bug — job state is keyed by the job id created at INSERT. The
/status?pid=query param is the job id despite its name. Row column map (transcriptions): 0 id, 1 youtube_url, 2 media_path, 3 language, 4 model, 5 translation, 6 language_translation, 7 file_export, 8 status, 9 created_at, 10 completed_at, 11 progress, 12 pid (OS pid, last column — only for kill/cancel). - Worker liveness: flag any way the worker can stop or stall without a terminal DB write — not just error paths that skip the update, but crashes before any DB code runs (import failures), undrained pipes, and hangs. The frontend polls forever on whatever progress value was last written.
- Unicode: PDF/export paths must handle Greek/Cyrillic (core use case). Any
latin-1,ascii, orerrors="replace"encoding in an output path is a rejection. - Limits copy sync: changes to
MAX_UPLOAD_SIZE_MB/MAX_VIDEO_DURATIONmust also updatetemplates/index.htmlandtemplates/faq.html. - Memory & event loop: the upload path must stay memory-bounded end to end — streaming the upload to disk doesn't help if a later step (decode, convert) loads the whole file into RAM. Long-running sync work called from an
async defhandler blocks every other request; it belongs in a threadpool or the worker. - File-level job isolation: per-job artifacts must be keyed by job id, not bare filename, and cleanup must delete only that job's files — two concurrent jobs must not share or delete each other's media.
- SQLite: no shared module-level connections; per-operation connections with WAL. Handlers are async; workers are separate processes.
- Dependencies: torch and torchaudio pinned as the same verified pair in requirements.txt and the Dockerfile (torchaudio has had no release after 2.11.0 as of 2026-10-26; a torch bump needs docker_e2e evidence); a new package needs either an import in src/ or a documented runtime need of a declared dep (e.g. jinja2 for
fastapi.templating); test-only deps go in requirements-dev.txt. - Hygiene: no media/transcripts/.db files committed; no secrets, hard-coded emails, or API keys; product name is "Txtify" never "Textify"; user-facing docs must describe what the code actually does.
- Docker parity: paths must work both inside and outside the container (no hard-coded
/app/...); anything reachable only in Docker needs coverage inscripts/docker_e2e.sh. - Silent degradation: a job that completes at 100% must not ship corrupted output — best-effort fallbacks (e.g. translation line-count alignment) need to keep downstream converters correct, and deserve a test at the converter level, not just the fallback function.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today Changed 410b45da02bc
- 1mo ago First seen · 26 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A a6de9d2141f9
txtify-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository lkmeta/txtify (135 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 934 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
code-reviewer
Reviews one ticket's code changes against the project's coding rules and checks that every acceptance criterion is met. Read-only, never modifies files.
test-reviewer
Reviews the tests one ticket adds or changes against the project's test rules and checks that every acceptance criterion has a test. Read-only, never modifies files.
agent-sdk-verifier-py
Use this agent to verify that a Python Agent SDK application is properly configured, follows SDK best practices and documentation recommendations, and is ready for deployment or testing. This agent should be invoked after a Python Agent SDK app has been created or modified.
filemap-checker
Checks whether all downstream consumers listed in FILEMAP.md have been updated after a change. Use proactively after modifying files.
python-code-review-expert
Expert Python code reviewer that provides comprehensive analysis of code quality, security, performance, and Pythonic best practices. Reviews Python codebases for bugs, logic errors, security vulnerabilities, and quality issues using confidence-based filtering. Use PROACTIVELY for Python code reviews and pull request…
commit-pusher
Commits and pushes changes. Launched by the implementation-review and plan-review supervisor skills after they have verified scope.