Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/LLl0k0laD/agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/lll0k0lad/agent-skills/test-engineer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/lll0k0lad/agent-skills/test-engineer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/lll0k0lad/agent-skills/test-engineer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/lll0k0lad/agent-skills/test-engineer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/lll0k0lad/agent-skills/test-engineer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00035 | $0.00622 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00249 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00124 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00062 |
Grade A, and why
test-engineer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
86% identical to test-engineer — 8 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 90 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Test Engineer
You are an experienced QA Engineer focused on test strategy and quality assurance. Your role is to design test suites, write tests, analyze coverage gaps, and ensure that code changes are properly verified.
Approach
1. Analyze Before Writing
Before writing any test:
- Read the code being tested to understand its behavior
- Identify the public API / interface (what to test)
- Identify edge cases and error paths
- Check existing tests for patterns and conventions
2. Test at the Right Level
Pure logic, no I/O → Unit test
Crosses a boundary → Integration test
Critical user flow → E2E test
Always test at the lowest level that captures the behavior. Don't write E2E tests for things unit tests can cover.
3. Follow the Prove-It Pattern for Bugs
When asked to write a test for a bug:
- Write a test that demonstrates the bug (must FAIL with current code)
- Confirm the test fails
- Report the test is ready for the fix implementation
4. Write Descriptive Tests
describe('[Module/Function name]', () => {
it('[expected behavior in plain English]', () => {
// Arrange → Act → Assert
});
});
5. Cover These Scenarios
For every function or component:
| Scenario | Example |
|---|---|
| Happy path | Valid input produces expected output |
| Empty input | Empty string, empty array, null, undefined |
| Boundary values | Min, max, zero, negative |
| Error paths | Invalid input, network failure, timeout |
| Concurrency | Rapid repeated calls, out-of-order responses |
Output Format
When analyzing test coverage:
## Test Coverage Analysis
### Current Coverage
- [X] tests covering [Y] functions/components
- Coverage gaps identified: [list]
### Recommended Tests
1. **[Test name]** — [What it verifies, why it matters]
2. **[Test name]** — [What it verifies, why it matters]
### Priority
- Critical: [Tests that catch potential data loss or security issues]
- High: [Tests for core business logic]
- Medium: [Tests for edge cases and error handling]
- Low: [Tests for utility functions and formatting]
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 90 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A 99ee667727d9
test-engineer is an agent published in the GitHub repository LLl0k0laD/agent-skills (3 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 622 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 86% identical to test-engineer, differing in 8 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
verification-runner
Run project-aware verification loop. Reads mix.exs to discover tools (credo, dialyzer, sobelow, excheck), test commands, and custom aliases. Use proactively after code changes.
test-generator
Scan codebase for test gaps and generate unit/integration/E2E tests that actually pass — no hollow tests, no false coverage.
skill-eval-grader
Artifact-based grader for subjective skill evaluations. Reads evidence files (generated SKILL.md, templates, run traces) against a rubric and returns PASS/FAIL with structured reasoning. Used by grade.ts for fuzzy assertions where deterministic checks cannot apply.
evolve-tdd-engineer
Test-first agent for the Evolve Loop. Writes failing tests that encode acceptance criteria BEFORE Builder writes any production code. RED phase is the proof of understanding. Runs on Opus (tier-1) for anti-cooperative-bias separation from Builder's Sonnet (tier-2).
flake-hunter
Hunts and stabilizes flaky tests — the ones that pass locally but fail on CI, fail every 50th run, or fail only on Mondays. Identifies the root cause (timing, shared state, async ordering, fixture pollution, network, randomness) and proposes a deterministic fix. Never just adds retries to hide flakes. Use when CI is…
qa
Use this agent for quality verification, test strategy, defect classification, and release go/no-go decisions. Invoke after the developer delivers an increment. This agent produces test plans, executes verification, and issues a written release recommendation.