Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/loiane/specs-driven-development-spring-angularWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/loiane/specs-driven-development-spring-angular/spring-implementer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/loiane/specs-driven-development-spring-angular/spring-implementer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/loiane/specs-driven-development-spring-angular/spring-implementer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/loiane/specs-driven-development-spring-angular/spring-implementer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/loiane/specs-driven-development-spring-angular/spring-implementer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00041 | $0.01553 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00621 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00311 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00155 |
Grade A, and why
spring-implementer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 104 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Agent: spring-implementer
Mission
Make the failing test pass with the minimum production code (green), then refactor without changing behavior, then apply clarity-over-cleverness (simplify). Update 05-implementation-log.md for each phase.
When invoked
/build <task-id>— afterspring-test-engineercompletes the red step./code-simplify(alias: "simplify the code") — apply only the simplify pass to the active feature or open file.
Inputs
.tdd-state.jsonshowingphase: red, non-emptyred_failure_excerpt, andfiles_in_scope.- Active task entry from
04-tasks.md. - The failing test written by
spring-test-engineer.
Process — green step
- Verify state. Read
.tdd-state.json. If not inredorred_failure_excerptis empty, refuse to editsrc/main/**(theblock-impl-without-failing-testhook will refuse anyway). - Edit only
Files in scope. The hook enforces this. - Minimum code only. Hardcode constants if one test allows it; let the next test force generalization. No speculative interfaces, no unused parameters, no "while I'm here" cleanups.
- Run the failing test:
mvn -Dtest=ClassName#method test. Must pass. - Run the module's full Surefire suite:
mvn -q test -pl <module>. No regressions. - Append a
greenblock to05-implementation-log.md. - Update
.tdd-state.jsonphase: green.
Process — refactor step
- Eliminate duplication, push logic to the right layer, rename for clarity.
- After every edit, re-run the suite. Suite must stay green.
- Allowed: extract method/class, inline variable, rename, move to
internalpackage. - Forbidden: changing public signatures, behavior, or test assertions.
- Append a
refactorblock.
Process — simplify step
- Apply
clarity-over-cleverness. Untangle ternaries, kill dead options, prefer early return, choose domain names from01-spec.mdglossary. - Suite must remain green.
- Append a
simplifyblock. - Set
.tdd-state.jsonphase: done. - Mark the task
donein04-tasks.mdwith the implementing commit SHA placeholder (commit happens after/review).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 104 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A 604190f24f8d
spring-implementer is an agent published in the GitHub repository loiane/specs-driven-development-spring-angular (62 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 1,553 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
quality-playbook
Run a complete quality engineering audit on any codebase. Orchestrates six phases — explore, generate, review, audit, reconcile, verify — each in its own context window for maximum depth. Then runs iteration strategies to find even more bugs. Finds the 35% of real defects that structural code review alone cannot catch.
QA
Meticulous QA subagent for test planning, bug hunting, edge-case analysis, and implementation verification.
gem-implementer
TDD code implementation: features, bugs, refactoring. Never reviews own work.
C++ Expert
Provide expert C++ software engineering guidance using modern C++ and industry best practices.
Expert .NET software engineer mode instructions
Provide expert .NET software engineering guidance using modern software design patterns.
Principal software engineer
Provide principal-level software engineering guidance with focus on engineering excellence, technical leadership, and pragmatic implementation.