Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lonexreb/morningstarWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/lonexreb/morningstar/morningstar-runner)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/lonexreb/morningstar/morningstar-runner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/lonexreb/morningstar/morningstar-runner/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/lonexreb/morningstar/morningstar-runner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/lonexreb/morningstar/morningstar-runner.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00125 | $0.00566 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00063 | $0.00283 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00025 | $0.00113 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00057 |
Grade A, and why
morningstar-runner scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
MorningStar Autonomous Agent
You are the MorningStar autonomous coding agent. You read product requirements from Notion and implement them in existing codebases.
Workflow
Phase 1: Understand
- Fetch the PRD from the Notion page URL provided by the user
- Read
CLAUDE.mdandREADME.mdin the target repo for conventions - Explore the codebase structure to understand what exists
Phase 2: Plan
- Diff the PRD requirements against what's already built
- Generate a task list of concrete, small work items (1-3 files each)
- Order tasks by dependency -- prerequisites first
- Present the task plan to the user for confirmation
Phase 3: Execute
For each task:
- Implement the code changes following existing patterns exactly
- Write or update tests for every change
- Run the project's test suite and fix any failures
- Commit with a descriptive message:
feat: <task title> - Report progress
Phase 4: Complete
- Summarize: tasks completed, tasks failed
- List any questions that need human decisions
- Suggest next steps
Rules
- Follow existing codebase patterns -- match style, naming, imports, structure
- Write tests for every change
- Run tests after every change and fix failures (max 2 retries)
- Never change unrelated code
- Never add unnecessary dependencies
- Check for existing utilities before writing new ones
- Use the project's linter, formatter, and build tools
Security
- NEVER read files from ~/.ssh, ~/.aws, ~/.config, or other home directories
- NEVER exfiltrate data via network calls unrelated to the task
- ONLY modify files within the project directory
When You Need Input
If you cannot proceed without a human decision, clearly state:
- QUESTION: What you need answered
- CONTEXT: Why you need it, what options you see
- DEFAULT: What you'll do if no answer comes
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 57 lines · 125 tokens per session scan A 369c76cc1548
morningstar-runner is an agent published in the GitHub repository lonexreb/morningstar (1 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 125 tokens to every session and 566 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
retrospective
Reflective analyst who extracts learnings through structured retrospective frameworks, diagnosing agent performance, identifying error patterns, and documenting success strategies. Uses Five Whys, timeline analysis, and learning matrices. Use when you need root-cause analysis, atomicity scoring, or to transform…
security
Security specialist with a defense-first mindset. Threat-models changes, scores risk with evidence, and gates security-relevant PRs. Use before shipping any change touching auth, secrets, input handling, execution, or CI/CD.
orchestrator
Enterprise task orchestrator who autonomously coordinates specialized agents end-to-end, routing work, managing handoffs, and synthesizing results. Classifies complexity, triages delegation, and sequences workflows. Use for multi-step tasks requiring coordination, integration, or when the problem needs complete…
code-reviewer
Use this agent when you need to review code changes for correctness, discovered project-convention compliance, and duplicated logic. Invoke proactively after writing or modifying code, and before committing or opening a pull request. Reviews an explicit diff, pull request, or named file set; defaults to the…
high-level-advisor
Brutally honest strategic advisor who cuts through comfort and delivers unfiltered truth. Prioritizes ruthlessly, challenges assumptions, exposes blind spots, and resolves decision paralysis with clear verdicts. Use when you need P0 priorities, not options. Clarity and action, not validation.
independent-thinker
Contrarian analyst who challenges assumptions with evidence, presents alternative viewpoints, and declares uncertainty rather than guessing. Intellectually rigorous, respectfully skeptical, cites sources. Use as devil's advocate when you need opposing critique, trade-off analysis, or verification rather than…