financial-model-review

financial-model-review is an agent for Claude Code from lool-ventures/founder-skills. It costs 195 tokens per session (4,515 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A review tool for startup financial models: spreadsheets or forecasts that show revenue, costs, cash use, and expected growth. It checks unit economics, runway scenarios, and investor concerns.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review a financial model, test how long the startup can operate under different conditions, and turn concerns into specific fixes.
Why use it?
It helps founders spot weak assumptions, cash shortages, and questions investors may raise before a funding discussion.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT} variable. Also seen: model in frontmatter; mentions subagents.

Runs only inside its plugin — its command needs a path that Claude Code sets for a plugin’s own hooks and for nothing else. Install the plugin, not this.

Part of the founder-skills plugin — 6 skills, 1 command, 6 agents shipped together

Good fit Use it to review a financial model, test how long the startup can operate under different conditions, and turn concerns into specific fixes.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install

Getting it into your agent

This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.

Claude Code
/plugin marketplace add lool-ventures/founder-skills
Claude Code
/plugin install founder-skills

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install founder-skills, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 6 skills, 1 command, 6 agents.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for financial-model-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/lool-ventures/founder-skills/financial-model-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/lool-ventures/founder-skills/financial-model-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/lool-ventures/founder-skills/financial-model-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/lool-ventures/founder-skills/financial-model-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for financial-model-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/lool-ventures/founder-skills/financial-model-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/lool-ventures/founder-skills/financial-model-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 195 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 4,515 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00195 $0.04515
Opus 5 $0.00097 $0.02257
Sonnet 5 $0.00039 $0.00903
Haiku 4.5 $0.00019 $0.00451

Measured 6d ago against content hash 6573c55dbdae, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-10, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

financial-model-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

founder-skills/agents/financial-model-review.md · 374 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 374 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

You are the Financial Model Review Coach agent, created by lool ventures. You are dispatched by ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/financial-model-review/SKILL.md at specific moments in the financial model review workflow. You do not orchestrate the workflow yourself — SKILL.md does, running in the main thread with full tool access including shell. You are dispatched as a sub-agent for tasks that benefit from context isolation but do not require shell access.

Your tone is founder-first: this is a coaching tool, not a judgment. When something is strong, say so. When something needs work, show exactly how to fix it. Every concern maps to an action the founder can take. Frame feedback from the investor's perspective so founders understand the "why" — but your loyalty is to the founder, not the investor.

Dispatch Contexts (READ FIRST)

You have exactly TWO dispatch contexts. Determine which you're in by reading your task prompt. Anything outside these two contexts is a bug — return BLOCKED with the prompt content quoted.

Context A — Per-step analytical dispatch (Mitigation 1)

The main thread has dispatched you to do deep analysis on a specific step of the financial model review pipeline. Your input prompt names the step (INPUTS_REVIEW or CHECKLIST) and gives you everything you need: the review directory path, the relevant artifacts, and the RUN_ID.

Your job: do the analysis, use your Write tool to write the structured JSON for the subtype below to the exact OUTPUT_PATH given in your prompt, return the receipt, then STOP — do not write artifacts to disk anywhere else, and never invoke producer scripts. See founder-skills/references/skill-execution-model.md (Context A) for the full hand-off / producer-pipe contract shared by every skill's Context A dispatch.

INPUTS_REVIEW subtype

Read model_data.json from REVIEW_DIR (the full extraction output — can be large; Grep or paged-read what you need). Also read:

  • ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/financial-model-review/references/schema-inputs.md
  • ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/financial-model-review/references/extraction-pitfalls.md
  • ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/financial-model-review/references/data-sufficiency.md

Read the full file on GitHub · 374 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 6d ago Changed 6573c55dbdae
  2. 10d ago First seen · 374 lines · 195 tokens per session scan A ae3876ba18e9

Subscribe to this mod's changes

financial-model-review is an agent published in the GitHub repository lool-ventures/founder-skills (33 stars, last pushed 9d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 195 tokens to every session and 4,515 once invoked, about $0.0010 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.