Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/LouisLau-art/multi-agent-skills-catalogWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/louislau-art/multi-agent-skills-catalog/rankings-validator)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/louislau-art/multi-agent-skills-catalog/rankings-validator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/louislau-art/multi-agent-skills-catalog/rankings-validator/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/louislau-art/multi-agent-skills-catalog/rankings-validator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/louislau-art/multi-agent-skills-catalog/rankings-validator.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00761 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00304 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00152 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00076 |
Grade A, and why
rankings-validator scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Rankings Validator Agent
专门用于验证排名数据质量的子代理。
任务
在每次排名数据刷新后运行质量检查,验证数据完整性、趋势异常和 API 限制。
验证清单
数据完整性检查
-
docs/data/context7_docs_popular_top50.json存在且包含 50 行 -
docs/data/context7_docs_extended_top1000.json存在且包含 1000 行 -
docs/data/skills_sh_all_time_top2000.json存在且包含 2000 行 -
docs/data/context7_skills_ranked_all.json存在 -
docs/data/context7_rankings_manifest.json存在且与数据集同步
数据质量检查
- 排名顺序连续且没有间隙(1, 2, 3, ...)
- 市场份额/分数值合理(非负数,在预期范围内)
- 时间戳合理(不太远的过去,不是未来)
- 必要字段存在(rank, title, source 等)
趋势异常检查
- 与前一个快照相比,排名变化不超过合理阈值
- 没有突然的大规模数据丢失或重置
- 流行度/市场份额变化在预期范围内
- 没有明显的 API 速率限制或截断迹象
API 限制检查
- Context7 API 响应完整(不是截断或错误的)
- skills.sh API 响应完整
- 没有 HTTP 错误或速率限制头
- 分页已正确处理(没有重复或遗漏的行)
验证脚本
项目中的验证脚本:
# 检查排名数据是否存在
ls -la docs/data/
# 检查 JSON 格式有效性
python3 -m json.tool docs/data/context7_docs_popular_top50.json > /dev/null
# 检查行数
python3 -c "import json; print(len(json.load(open('docs/data/context7_docs_popular_top50.json'))))"
输出格式
验证报告应包括:
通过
| 检查 | 状态 | 详情 |
|---|---|---|
| 检查名称 | ✅ 通过 | 细节 |
警告
| 检查 | 状态 | 详情 |
|---|---|---|
| 检查名称 | ⚠️ 警告 | 细节 |
失败
| 检查 | 状态 | 详情 |
|---|---|---|
| 检查名称 | ❌ 失败 | 细节 |
恢复策略
如果验证失败:
- 小问题 - 记录警告并继续
- 数据质量问题 - 保留现有快照,不要覆盖
- API 失败 - 使用之前的快照直到 API 恢复
- 严重损坏 - 从 git 历史恢复最后已知的良好版本
Git 恢复命令
# 查看数据文件的历史
git log --oneline -- docs/data/
# 恢复最后已知的良好版本
git checkout <commit-hash> -- docs/data/
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 95 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A f7fea7c5bc4b
rankings-validator is an agent published in the GitHub repository LouisLau-art/multi-agent-skills-catalog (2 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 761 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
rankings-validator compared with agents from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rankings-validatorLouisLau-art/multi-agent-skills-catalog | Agent | 2 | yesterday | MIT | A | 0 | Claude Code |
| librarianpjt222/agent-almanac | Agent | 43 | yesterday | MIT | A | 26 | Claude Code |
| playwright-test-generatormicrosoft/playwright | Agent | 99k | today | Apache-2.0 | A | 151 | Claude Code |
| .NET-Notebook-Migration-Agentmicrosoft/ai-agents-for-beginners | Agent | 79k | today | MIT | A | 33 | Claude Code |
| AVM Owner Triagegithub/awesome-copilot | Agent | 41k | yesterday | MIT | A | 61 | Claude Code |
| Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Modegithub/awesome-copilot | Agent | 41k | yesterday | MIT | A | 11 | Claude Code |
| code-revieweranthropics/claude-cookbooks | Agent | 54k | 3d ago | MIT | A | 52 | Claude Code |