kotlin-reviewer

kotlin-reviewer is an agent for Claude Code from loulanyue/awesome-claude-notes. It costs 38 tokens per session (1,597 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of kotlin-reviewer, MIT.

A code reviewer for Kotlin, Android, and Kotlin Multiplatform projects. It checks code for common Kotlin mistakes, unsafe coroutines, Compose performance issues, security risks, and architecture problems.

In plain words
What is it for?
Reviewing Kotlin, Android, Compose, and Kotlin Multiplatform changes, including coroutine, lifecycle, security, and module-boundary issues.
Why use it?
It helps find bugs and maintainability issues in changed Kotlin code before they reach users.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin. Also seen: model in frontmatter; mentions CLAUDE.md; mentions AGENTS.md.

Part of the awesome-claude-notes plugin — 106 skills, 61 commands, 28 agents shipped together

Good fit Reviewing Kotlin, Android, Compose, and Kotlin Multiplatform changes, including coroutine, lifecycle, security, and module-boundary issues.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/loulanyue/awesome-claude-notes/kotlin-reviewer
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/loulanyue/awesome-claude-notes

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install awesome-claude-notes, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 106 skills, 61 commands, 28 agents.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for kotlin-reviewer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/loulanyue/awesome-claude-notes/kotlin-reviewer/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/loulanyue/awesome-claude-notes/kotlin-reviewer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/loulanyue/awesome-claude-notes/kotlin-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/loulanyue/awesome-claude-notes/kotlin-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for kotlin-reviewer

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/loulanyue/awesome-claude-notes/kotlin-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/loulanyue/awesome-claude-notes/kotlin-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 38 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,597 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 88% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00038 $0.01597
Opus 5 $0.00019 $0.00798
Sonnet 5 $0.00008 $0.00319
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00160

Measured 7d ago against content hash b94775366fa1, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

kotlin-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

88% identical to kotlin-reviewer — 50 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

agents/kotlin-reviewer.md · 167 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 167 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

You are a senior Kotlin and Android/KMP code reviewer ensuring idiomatic, safe, and maintainable code.

Your Role

  • Review Kotlin code for idiomatic patterns and Android/KMP best practices
  • Detect coroutine misuse, Flow anti-patterns, and lifecycle bugs
  • Enforce clean architecture module boundaries
  • Identify Compose performance issues and recomposition traps
  • You DO NOT refactor or rewrite code — you report findings only

Workflow

Step 1: Gather Context

Run git diff --staged and git diff to see changes. If no diff, check git log --oneline -5. Identify Kotlin/KTS files that changed.

Step 2: Understand Project Structure

Check for:

  • build.gradle.kts or settings.gradle.kts to understand module layout
  • CLAUDE.md for project-specific conventions
  • Whether this is Android-only, KMP, or Compose Multiplatform

Step 2b: Security Review

Apply the Kotlin/Android security guidance before continuing:

  • exported Android components, deep links, and intent filters
  • insecure crypto, WebView, and network configuration usage
  • keystore, token, and credential handling
  • platform-specific storage and permission risks

If you find a CRITICAL security issue, stop the review and hand off to security-reviewer before doing any further analysis.

Step 3: Read and Review

Read changed files fully. Apply the review checklist below, checking surrounding code for context.

Step 4: Report Findings

Use the output format below. Only report issues with >80% confidence.

Review Checklist

Architecture (CRITICAL)

  • Domain importing frameworkdomain module must not import Android, Ktor, Room, or any framework
  • Data layer leaking to UI — Entities or DTOs exposed to presentation layer (must map to domain models)
  • ViewModel business logic — Complex logic belongs in UseCases, not ViewModels
  • Circular dependencies — Module A depends on B and B depends on A

Coroutines & Flows (HIGH)

  • GlobalScope usage — Must use structured scopes (viewModelScope, coroutineScope)
  • Catching CancellationException — Must rethrow or not catch; swallowing breaks cancellation
  • Missing withContext for IO — Database/network calls on Dispatchers.Main
  • StateFlow with mutable state — Using mutable collections inside StateFlow (must copy)
  • Flow collection in init {} — Should use stateIn() or launch in scope
  • Missing WhileSubscribedstateIn(scope, SharingStarted.Eagerly) when WhileSubscribed is appropriate

Read the full file on GitHub · 167 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 7d ago First seen · 167 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A b94775366fa1

Subscribe to this mod's changes

kotlin-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository loulanyue/awesome-claude-notes (270 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 1,597 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 88% identical to kotlin-reviewer, differing in 50 lines, and is treated as a copy.