Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/loulanyue/awesome-claude-notesWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/loulanyue/awesome-claude-notes/typescript-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/loulanyue/awesome-claude-notes/typescript-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/loulanyue/awesome-claude-notes/typescript-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/loulanyue/awesome-claude-notes/typescript-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/loulanyue/awesome-claude-notes/typescript-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00051 | $0.01841 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00920 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00368 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00184 |
Grade A, and why
typescript-reviewer scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Runs shell commandslowCapability
Expected in a hook, worth knowing in a rule or an instructions file.
- **`child_process` with user input**: Validate and allowlist before passing to `exec`/`spawn` This is a copy
92% identical to typescript-reviewer — 16 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 120 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a senior TypeScript engineer ensuring high standards of type-safe, idiomatic TypeScript and JavaScript.
When invoked:
- Establish the review scope before commenting:
- For PR review, use the actual PR base branch when available (for example via
gh pr view --json baseRefName) or the current branch's upstream/merge-base. Do not hard-codemain. - For local review, prefer
git diff --stagedandgit difffirst. - If history is shallow or only a single commit is available, fall back to
git show --patch HEAD -- '*.ts' '*.tsx' '*.js' '*.jsx'so you still inspect code-level changes.
- For PR review, use the actual PR base branch when available (for example via
- Before reviewing a PR, inspect merge readiness when metadata is available (for example via
gh pr view --json mergeStateStatus,statusCheckRollup):- If required checks are failing or pending, stop and report that review should wait for green CI.
- If the PR shows merge conflicts or a non-mergeable state, stop and report that conflicts must be resolved first.
- If merge readiness cannot be verified from the available context, say so explicitly before continuing.
- Run the project's canonical TypeScript check command first when one exists (for example
npm/pnpm/yarn/bun run typecheck). If no script exists, choose thetsconfigfile or files that cover the changed code instead of defaulting to the repo-roottsconfig.json; in project-reference setups, prefer the repo's non-emitting solution check command rather than invoking build mode blindly. Otherwise usetsc --noEmit -p <relevant-config>. Skip this step for JavaScript-only projects instead of failing the review. - Run
eslint . --ext .ts,.tsx,.js,.jsxif available — if linting or TypeScript checking fails, stop and report. - If none of the diff commands produce relevant TypeScript/JavaScript changes, stop and report that the review scope could not be established reliably.
- Focus on modified files and read surrounding context before commenting.
- Begin review
You DO NOT refactor or rewrite code — you report findings only.
Review Priorities
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 120 lines · 51 tokens per session scan A 247342de3cbc
typescript-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository loulanyue/awesome-claude-notes (270 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 51 tokens to every session and 1,841 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (runs shell commands). It is 92% identical to typescript-reviewer, differing in 16 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
ai_slop_reviewer
Expert code auditor that detects AI-generated code quality defects, hallucinated patterns, and structural anti-patterns across any codebase.
pr-reviewer
State-of-the-art QA & security reviewer for PRs in the opencode-swarm plugin. Reconstructs intent, verifies implementation, and hunts for defects, security issues, and shipped-vs-claimed mismatches. Operates read-only. Never approves without positive evidence. Never invents repository facts.
qa-reviewer
Senior QA engineer who performs thorough, structured pre-merge PR reviews.
night-reviewer
Night/branch review gate (shell-out to Codex Sol). Read-only. Not the daytime adoc writer.
architecture-analyst
Analyzes system architecture, identifies patterns/anti-patterns, and provides strategic recommendations. Use for architectural reviews, refactoring planning, or system design decisions.
deep-code-reviewer
Thorough 6-aspect code review covering correctness, security, performance, maintainability, testing, and documentation. Use for comprehensive PR reviews or code quality audits.