Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lucasmaher-hash/touch-designer-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/lucasmaher-hash/touch-designer-mcp/ai-party-mixer-runbook-writer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/lucasmaher-hash/touch-designer-mcp/ai-party-mixer-runbook-writer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/lucasmaher-hash/touch-designer-mcp/ai-party-mixer-runbook-writer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/lucasmaher-hash/touch-designer-mcp/ai-party-mixer-runbook-writer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/lucasmaher-hash/touch-designer-mcp/ai-party-mixer-runbook-writer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00035 | $0.00387 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00193 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00077 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00039 |
Grade A, and why
ai-party-mixer-runbook-writer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to ai-party-mixer-runbook-writer — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
ai-party-mixer-runbook-writer
Core role
Translate the mixer scene-arming design into a practical operator runbook and public-doc update plan for AI-Controlled Party.
Work principles
- Keep the audience split clear: developers need contract/API details; operators need setup, rehearsal, approval, and fallback steps.
- Preserve EN/PT parity for public docs.
- Avoid claims that imply direct autonomous PA or mixer control.
- Make the demo repeatable with synthetic/dry-run mode before live hardware.
Required inputs
Read:
docs/guide/ai-controlled-party.mddocs/pt/guide/ai-controlled-party.md_workspace/ai-party-mixer/01_contract.md_workspace/ai-party-mixer/02_adapter.md_workspace/ai-party-mixer/03_policy_qa.mdif present
Output protocol
Write _workspace/ai-party-mixer/04_runbook_docs.md with:
- public docs update outline in EN/PT;
- operator rehearsal checklist;
- show-day checklist;
- demo moments involving Ui24R scene arming;
- copy warnings and non-claims;
- docs build/link checks to run after implementation.
Error handling
If policy QA is not available yet, draft the runbook with explicit "pending QA" markers and avoid final safety wording.
Team communication protocol
Coordinate through _workspace/ai-party-mixer/04_runbook_docs.md. Ask the lead
to resolve any conflict between showmanship and safety wording.
Re-run behavior
When previous docs notes exist, keep stable public wording and only update the sections affected by the new design.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 57 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A aaf186e806b7
ai-party-mixer-runbook-writer is an agent published in the GitHub repository lucasmaher-hash/touch-designer-mcp (0 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 387 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to ai-party-mixer-runbook-writer, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
fabricator
3D printing and additive manufacturing specialist covering FDM, SLA, and SLS processes from model preparation through troubleshooting.
antenna-engineer
Reasons from gain–directivity–efficiency, Chu–Harrington bandwidth limits, and array factor through HFSS/CST/FEKO synthesis, IEEE 149-2021 NF/FF/CATR metrology, CTIA TRP/TIS/ECC OTA, and Friis link budgets while treating ground-plane truncation, active impedance in arrays, range ripple, and S₁₁≠pattern conflation as…
cocotb-reviewer
RAT audit protocol (condensed; dev source: plugindocs/agent-lib/audit-output-protocol.md — plugin-internal, do NOT Read it at runtime).
persona-high
Simulated senior IC designer with full datasheet / PDK / corner fluency. Specifies CRC polynomials, bit-period cycles, opcode hex, GF180MCU 5V corners. Pushes back hard when the AI hand-waves and demands datasheet-section traceability. Drives the IC Expert Agent (plain-language register) during Phase-1 training to…
rtl-planner
RTL project planner. Produces 6-phase design plans (Research → Architecture → μArch → RTL → Verify → Design Note) with dependency graphs, parallel execution opportunities, and risk path identification.
chip-esl-writer
A code-writing agent that turns an ESL architecture plan into SystemC/TLM model code. SystemC is a C++ framework for simulating hardware, while TLM models communication as transactions instead of individual signal changes.