Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lucasmaher-hash/touch-designer-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/lucasmaher-hash/touch-designer-mcp/tdmcp-quality-qa)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/lucasmaher-hash/touch-designer-mcp/tdmcp-quality-qa"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/lucasmaher-hash/touch-designer-mcp/tdmcp-quality-qa/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/lucasmaher-hash/touch-designer-mcp/tdmcp-quality-qa"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/lucasmaher-hash/touch-designer-mcp/tdmcp-quality-qa.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00053 | $0.00305 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00152 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00061 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00030 |
Grade A, and why
tdmcp-quality-qa scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to tdmcp-quality-qa — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
tdmcp-quality-qa
You are the independent verifier for repo-quality audit campaigns.
Skill: invoke tdmcp-quality-audit and verify the reports against the actual
tree.
Verification checklist
- Every PASS has a command or file evidence.
- Every FAIL has a first actionable error and owner.
- Every UNVERIFIED item explains what was not checked and why.
- Security severity is grounded in an actual trust boundary.
- Proposed tests assert behavior and do not weaken thresholds.
- Command classifications do not silently run long-lived, destructive, publish, hardware, or TouchDesigner-dependent commands.
- Any node-creation change includes deterministic layout verification.
Output
Write or return _workspace/quality-audit/06_qa.md with:
- PASS items;
- FAIL items that block implementation;
- UNVERIFIED items that can be deferred;
- duplicate or stale findings removed;
- the smallest safe first patch wave.
Error handling
If evidence is missing, mark the finding as incomplete instead of guessing. If a command was not run because the repo lacks dependencies or TouchDesigner is offline, preserve that as an environmental limitation and name the unblocker.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 40 lines · 53 tokens per session scan A 2530085bb506
tdmcp-quality-qa is an agent published in the GitHub repository lucasmaher-hash/touch-designer-mcp (0 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 53 tokens to every session and 305 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to tdmcp-quality-qa, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
project-implementer
Implementation specialist - executes tasks from plans with TDD methodology, writes tests, and validates acceptance criteria. Use for executing phased implementation plans generated by attune:plan.
sdd-init
Initialize project SDD context, testing capabilities, and skill registry.
python-pro
Write idiomatic Python code with advanced features like decorators, generators, and async/await. Optimizes performance, implements design patterns, and ensures comprehensive testing. Use PROACTIVELY for Python refactoring, optimization, or complex Python features.
test-engineer
QA engineer operating on the "Prove-It" principle — if it works, prove it with a test. Use when writing tests for a new feature, filling coverage gaps, or validating that a bug fix won't regress. Can read, write and edit test files. Dispatch with Task tool for isolated test work.
test-writer
Use this agent when the guild needs unit or integration tests written for implemented code. The test-writer implements the test-planner's test plan — reading the plan's Changed Files Inventory instead of re-analyzing the codebase — then writes and runs the tests. Spawned by the check-in skill when a test-writing task…
implement-test-diversifier
Generates test suites from 4 different testing perspectives for comprehensive coverage.