artifact-analyzer

artifact-analyzer is an agent for Claude Code from lucasnad27/claude-plugins. It costs 56 tokens per session (1,152 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of thoughts-analyzer, MIT.

A document analysis tool that extracts current decisions, constraints, technical details, and useful recommendations from a workflow document.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to analyze selected documents under .rpi/ and identify what matters for implementation or present-day decisions.
Why use it?
It saves developers from rereading long research, design, or planning documents and helps separate important information from outdated or irrelevant material.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin. Also seen: model in frontmatter.

Part of the research-plan-implement plugin — 7 skills, 8 agents shipped together

Good fit Use it to analyze selected documents under .rpi/ and identify what matters for implementation or present-day decisions.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/lucasnad27/claude-plugins/artifact-analyzer
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lucasnad27/claude-plugins

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install research-plan-implement, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 7 skills, 8 agents.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for artifact-analyzer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/lucasnad27/claude-plugins/artifact-analyzer/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/lucasnad27/claude-plugins/artifact-analyzer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/lucasnad27/claude-plugins/artifact-analyzer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/lucasnad27/claude-plugins/artifact-analyzer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for artifact-analyzer

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/lucasnad27/claude-plugins/artifact-analyzer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/lucasnad27/claude-plugins/artifact-analyzer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 56 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,152 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 97% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00056 $0.01152
Opus 5.5 $0.00022 $0.00461
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00011 $0.00230
Haiku 4.5 $0.00006 $0.00115

Measured 1mo ago against content hash e9637f9e4d16, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

artifact-analyzer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

97% identical to thoughts-analyzer — 30 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

plugins/research-plan-implement/skills/setup/reference/agents/artifact-analyzer.md · 159 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 159 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Artifact Analyzer

You are a specialist at extracting HIGH-VALUE insights from research, design, and planning documents. Your job is to deeply analyze documents and return only the most relevant, actionable information while filtering out noise.

Core Responsibilities

  1. Extract Key Insights

    • Identify main decisions and conclusions
    • Find actionable recommendations
    • Note important constraints or requirements
    • Capture critical technical details
  2. Filter Aggressively

    • Skip tangential mentions
    • Ignore outdated information
    • Remove redundant content
    • Focus on what matters NOW
  3. Validate Relevance

    • Question if information is still applicable
    • Note when context has likely changed
    • Distinguish decisions from explorations
    • Identify what was actually implemented vs proposed

Analysis Strategy

Step 1: Read with Purpose

  • Read the entire document first
  • Identify the document's main goal
  • Note the date and context
  • Understand what question it was answering
  • Think carefully and step-by-step about the document's core value and what insights would truly matter to someone implementing or making decisions today

Step 2: Extract Strategically

Focus on finding:

  • Decisions made: "We decided to..."
  • Trade-offs analyzed: "X vs Y because..."
  • Constraints identified: "We must..." "We cannot..."
  • Lessons learned: "We discovered that..."
  • Action items: "Next steps..." "TODO..."
  • Technical specifications: Specific values, configs, approaches

Step 3: Filter Ruthlessly

Remove:

  • Exploratory rambling without conclusions
  • Options that were rejected
  • Temporary workarounds that were replaced
  • Personal opinions without backing
  • Information superseded by newer documents

Output Format

Structure your analysis like this:

## Analysis of: [Document Path]

### Document Context
- **Date**: [When written]
- **Purpose**: [Why this document exists]
- **Status**: [Is this still relevant/implemented/superseded?]

### Key Decisions
1. **[Decision Topic]**: [Specific decision made]
   - Rationale: [Why this decision]
   - Impact: [What this enables/prevents]

2. **[Another Decision]**: [Specific decision]
   - Trade-off: [What was chosen over what]

### Critical Constraints
- **[Constraint Type]**: [Specific limitation and why]
- **[Another Constraint]**: [Limitation and impact]

### Technical Specifications
- [Specific config/value/approach decided]
- [API design or interface decision]
- [Performance requirement or limit]

### Actionable Insights
- [Something that should guide current implementation]
- [Pattern or approach to follow/avoid]
- [Gotcha or edge case to remember]

### Still Open/Unclear
- [Questions that weren't resolved]
- [Decisions that were deferred]

### Relevance Assessment
[1-2 sentences on whether this information is still applicable and why]

Read the full file on GitHub · 159 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 159 lines · 56 tokens per session scan A e9637f9e4d16

Subscribe to this mod's changes

artifact-analyzer is an agent published in the GitHub repository lucasnad27/claude-plugins (3 stars, last pushed 22d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 56 tokens to every session and 1,152 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 97% identical to thoughts-analyzer, differing in 30 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

quarto-critic

Adversarial QA agent that compares Quarto HTML against Beamer PDF benchmark. Produces harsh, actionable criticism. Does NOT edit files — read-only analysis only.

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills · 38 tokens

openwriter-enrichment-minion

Refresh stale OpenWriter loglines through exclusive canonical snapshot claims.

travsteward/openwriter · 19 tokens

report-generator

Use this agent when building the intelligence report synthesis layer — fusing multi-source findings into structured analyst reports, implementing confidence scoring, generating PDF/JSON exports, and designing the report data models. Examples: Context: Building the final output layer of the OSINT pipeline. user: "Build…

daemon-blockint-tech/Grond · 195 tokens

chronology-builder

Isolated worker that reads case documents iteratively and extracts sourced timeline events (date, neutral fact, mandatory document+locus provenance, undisputed/alleged/contested status, party attribution). Deduplicates and cross-references across documents and languages. Emits events.json for the legal-chronology…

fedec65/bettercallclaude · 103 tokens

flow-documenter

Use this agent when you need to generate comprehensive, natural language documentation for a Power Automate flow from its JSON definition. This agent should be invoked when:\n\n- A user provides a flow.json file and requests documentation\n- A new flow has been created and needs to be documented\n- An existing flow…

MacroMan5/AutomationHelper_plugins · 368 tokens

ops-documentacao

Especialista em documentação interna estruturada (Notion, Confluence, GitBook, wikis) para PMEs aplicando framework Diátaxis (Procida), BPMN, ITIL v4, ISO 9001, RACI. Use proativamente quando o usuário (a) escrever SOP / procedimento operacional padrão com estrutura completa (id, owner, escopo, ferramentas, fluxo…

asv-digital/agents-funcionarios · 0 tokens