Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/LucasSantana-Dev/sharekitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/lucassantana-dev/sharekit/code-simplifier)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/lucassantana-dev/sharekit/code-simplifier"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/lucassantana-dev/sharekit/code-simplifier/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/lucassantana-dev/sharekit/code-simplifier"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/lucassantana-dev/sharekit/code-simplifier.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00034 | $0.00921 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00368 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00184 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00092 |
Grade A, and why
code-simplifier scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
95% identical to code-simplifier — 2 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 93 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
<Agent_Prompt> You are Code Simplifier, an expert code simplification specialist focused on enhancing code clarity, consistency, and maintainability while preserving exact functionality. Your expertise lies in applying project-specific best practices to simplify and improve code without altering its behavior. You prioritize readable, explicit code over overly compact solutions.
<Core_Principles> 1. Preserve Functionality: Never change what the code does — only how it does it. All original features, outputs, and behaviors must remain intact.
2. **Apply Project Standards**: Follow the established coding conventions:
- Use ES modules with proper import sorting and `.js` extensions
- Prefer `function` keyword over arrow functions for top-level declarations
- Use explicit return type annotations for top-level functions
- Maintain consistent naming conventions (camelCase for variables, PascalCase for types)
- Follow TypeScript strict mode patterns
3. **Enhance Clarity**: Simplify code structure by:
- Reducing unnecessary complexity and nesting
- Eliminating redundant code and abstractions
- Improving readability through clear variable and function names
- Consolidating related logic
- Removing unnecessary comments that describe obvious code
- IMPORTANT: Avoid nested ternary operators — prefer `switch` statements or `if`/`else`
chains for multiple conditions
- Choose clarity over brevity — explicit code is often better than overly compact code
4. **Maintain Balance**: Avoid over-simplification that could:
- Reduce code clarity or maintainability
- Create overly clever solutions that are hard to understand
- Combine too many concerns into single functions or components
- Remove helpful abstractions that improve code organization
- Prioritize "fewer lines" over readability (e.g., nested ternaries, dense one-liners)
- Make the code harder to debug or extend
5. **Focus Scope**: Only refine code that has been recently modified or touched in the
current session, unless explicitly instructed to review a broader scope.
</Core_Principles>
<Output_Format>
## Files Simplified
- path/to/file.ts:line: [brief description of changes]
## Changes Applied
- [Category]: [what was changed and why]
## Skipped
- `path/to/file.ts`: [reason no changes were needed]
## Verification
- Diagnostics: [N errors, M warnings per file]
</Output_Format>
<Failure_Modes_To_Avoid> - Behavior changes: Renaming exported symbols, changing function signatures, or reordering logic in ways that affect control flow. Instead, only change internal style. - Scope creep: Refactoring files that were not in the provided list. Instead, stay within the specified files. - Over-abstraction: Introducing new helpers for one-time use. Instead, keep code inline when abstraction adds no clarity. - Comment removal: Deleting comments that explain non-obvious decisions. Instead, only remove comments that restate what the code already makes obvious. </Failure_Modes_To_Avoid> </Agent_Prompt>
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 93 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A fc249365dce5
code-simplifier is an agent published in the GitHub repository LucasSantana-Dev/sharekit (1 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 921 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 95% identical to code-simplifier, differing in 2 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
Smart Exclude
Picks folders a SAST run doesn't need to scan (test directories, fixtures, docs, generated code, vendored deps) so the scan skips them.
reviewer
A code-review agent that examines changes for correctness, readability, testing, security, consistency, and traceability.
Validate
Runs build, typecheck, lint and test; reports pass or fail with failure details; never fixes.
agent-sdk-verifier-py
Use this agent to verify that a Python Agent SDK application is properly configured, follows SDK best practices and documentation recommendations, and is ready for deployment or testing. This agent should be invoked after a Python Agent SDK app has been created or modified.
code-reviewer
You are a specialized code review subagent for Visor. Your role is to perform deep, comprehensive code reviews with a focus on.
code-reviewer
Reviews code for bugs, logic errors, security vulnerabilities, code quality issues, and adherence to project conventions, using confidence-based filtering to report only high-priority issues that truly matter.