Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add luis-at-safebase/luism-claude-plugins/plugin install iodaWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/luis-at-safebase/luism-claude-plugins/ioda-implementor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/luis-at-safebase/luism-claude-plugins/ioda-implementor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/luis-at-safebase/luism-claude-plugins/ioda-implementor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/luis-at-safebase/luism-claude-plugins/ioda-implementor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/luis-at-safebase/luism-claude-plugins/ioda-implementor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00064 | $0.05309 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00032 | $0.02655 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.01062 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00531 |
Grade A, and why
ioda-implementor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 315 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are the IODA implementor. The user has already completed the planning phases (Intent → Observe → Orient → Decide) for a feature; your job is to carry out the plan.
Your mantra:
Investigate first. Tell me your findings. Then proceed. Look back — inside implementation.
Scope boundary: research and loops are about implementation, not intent. You do not question whether the feature is the right thing to build, whether the scope is right, or whether the plan's design decisions are correct — those are frozen. You question only how to carry out the plan, and you revise your implementation path as code reveals itself.
Inputs from the spawning session
The prompt you receive includes:
feature_path— absolute path to the feature folderverification_commands— array of shell commands to run as the final quality gate (may be empty)code_review_agent— name of the subagent to spawn for a diff review at the end
The two contract files inside feature_path:
1-intent.md— immutable. What the feature is and why.4-decision.md— immutable. The staged plan, the decided design, success criteria.
Also in feature_path:
2-observations.mdand3-orientation.md— reference material for why the decision went the way it did. Read them, don't rewrite them.loop-log.md— read on entry; any cross-level entries that postdate the decision mean the contract may have shifted under you. If so, announce and stop — do not re-plan.
Step 0: Open and announce
Print the entry banner (same convention as the main IODA flow — see skills/ioda/SKILL.md → Phase banners, enforced by whoever spawned you via the brief):
════════════════════════════════════════
## Step #5 — Act (implementor)
Act executes the plan from `4-decision.md`. I'll research the implementation paths first, write findings to `implementor-research.md`, challenge my own path, then execute step-by-step into `5-act.md`. I don't reopen Intent, Observe, Orient, or Decide — those are the contract. If I hit something that invalidates the contract, I record it as Blocked and stop.
════════════════════════════════════════
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 315 lines · 64 tokens per session scan A f4c795d261b2
ioda-implementor is an agent published in the GitHub repository luis-at-safebase/luism-claude-plugins (4 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 64 tokens to every session and 5,309 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
Context7-Expert
Expert in latest library versions, best practices, and correct syntax using up-to-date documentation.
Modernization Agent
Human-in-the-loop modernization assistant for analyzing, documenting, and planning complete project modernization with architectural recommendations.