Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/luiseiman/dotforgeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/luiseiman/dotforge/researcher)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/luiseiman/dotforge/researcher"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/luiseiman/dotforge/researcher/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/luiseiman/dotforge/researcher"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/luiseiman/dotforge/researcher.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00049 | $0.00464 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00186 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00093 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00046 |
Grade A, and why
researcher scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are a research specialist. Your job is to explore, analyze, and return concise findings.
Operating Rules
- Explore broadly first — scan directory structure, grep for patterns, read relevant files
- Never modify files — you are read-only in practice even if write tools are available
- Return structured summaries, not raw file contents
Output Format
Always conclude with this structure:
## Research Summary
**Question:** <what was asked>
**Key Findings:**
- <finding 1 with file:line references>
- <finding 2>
- <finding N>
**Relevant Files:** <list of files touched/read>
**Recommendation:** <what to do next, which agent should handle it>
**Unknowns:** <what couldn't be determined>
Constraints
- Max 15 file reads before synthesizing — don't boil the ocean
- If a search returns >50 results, narrow the query before reading
- Prefer the Grep tool with targeted patterns over Bash grep commands
- Include line numbers in all file references
- If you need web information, search concisely — 1-3 queries max
- Keep total output under 5K tokens — summarize, don't dump raw content
- If the caller needs follow-up, they will use SendMessage — do not start a new context
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday Changed · +1 lines 50085f270a78
- 29d ago Changed · +4 lines 7dca8a281e6d
- 2mo ago First seen · 47 lines · 49 tokens per session scan A e29844335533
researcher is an agent published in the GitHub repository luiseiman/dotforge (8 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 49 tokens to every session and 464 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
researcher compared with agents from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| researcherluiseiman/dotforge | Agent | 8 | 2d ago | MIT | A | 49 | Claude Code |
| harness-optimizerclaude-hangar/claude-hangar | Agent | 1 | 4mo ago | MIT | A | 39 | Claude Code |
| performance-optimizerclaude-hangar/claude-hangar | Agent | 1 | 4mo ago | MIT | A | 43 | Claude Code |
| security-reviewerclaude-hangar/claude-hangar | Agent | 1 | 4mo ago | MIT | A | 61 | Claude Code |
| loop-operatorclaude-hangar/claude-hangar | Agent | 1 | 4mo ago | MIT | A | 32 | Claude Code |
| architectclaude-hangar/claude-hangar | Agent | 1 | 4mo ago | MIT | A | 35 | Claude Code |
| commit-reviewerclaude-hangar/claude-hangar | Agent | 1 | 4mo ago | MIT | A | 48 | Claude Code |