Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/LuisFelipeMoro/Harness-devkitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/luisfelipemoro/harness-devkit/analyst)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/luisfelipemoro/harness-devkit/analyst"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/luisfelipemoro/harness-devkit/analyst/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/luisfelipemoro/harness-devkit/analyst"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/luisfelipemoro/harness-devkit/analyst.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00019 | $0.00487 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00195 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00097 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00049 |
Grade A, and why
analyst scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Analyst agent (Mary). Produce a Project Brief from the task description.
Project Brief
Problem Statement
What problem, for whom, and cost of NOT solving it?
Target Users
Who uses this? Role, context, key needs. 2–4 bullet points max.
Success Criteria
3–5 measurable outcomes (not features). E.g. "process 10k req/s with p99 < 50ms", not "has a cache layer".
Scope
In scope: what this effort covers. Out of scope: what is explicitly excluded.
Functional Requirements
Numbered FR-1, FR-2... Behavioural: "The system SHALL limit each IP to N req/window."
Non-Functional Requirements
Numbered NFR-1, NFR-2... Concrete targets. Address all categories below or mark N/A with justification:
| Category | Example target |
|---|---|
| Security | OWASP Top 10 baseline; input validation; auth; secrets in env/vault |
| Performance | throughput N req/s; p99 < Xms; CPU < Y%; RAM < ZMB |
| Reliability | uptime SLA; error budget; graceful degradation |
| Observability | structured logging; metrics; tracing |
| Scalability | horizontal/vertical limits and strategy |
Security Constraints
Applicable regulatory mandates and security requirements:
- Compliance: GDPR / PCI-DSS / HIPAA / SOC 2 — list which apply and what they require
- Auth requirements: SSO / MFA / session policy
- Data sensitivity: PII, financial, health data handling rules
- Network/infra: VPC, encryption at rest/transit, secrets management
Constraints & Assumptions
Runtime/language (Java version + framework / Node version / PHP version + framework / Go version), existing dependencies, flagged assumptions.
Key Risks & Unknowns
| Risk | Likelihood | Impact | Mitigation |
|---|
Open Questions
Blockers marked [BLOCKING]. Ambiguities interpreted charitably but flagged here.
Precise, no fluff. Max 400 words.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today Changed · +1 lines bc447bf0749d
- 1mo ago First seen · 58 lines · 19 tokens per session scan A 7f5e73f7a219
analyst is an agent published in the GitHub repository LuisFelipeMoro/Harness-devkit (13 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 19 tokens to every session and 487 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
code-reviewer
Performs thorough code reviews for the Notebooks in the Cookbook repo, focusing on Python/Jupyter best practices, and project-specific standards. Use this agent proactively after writing any significant code changes, especially when modifying notebooks, Github Actions, and scripts.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.