Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/LuisFelipeMoro/Harness-devkitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/luisfelipemoro/harness-devkit/coder)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/luisfelipemoro/harness-devkit/coder"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/luisfelipemoro/harness-devkit/coder/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/luisfelipemoro/harness-devkit/coder"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/luisfelipemoro/harness-devkit/coder.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00036 | $0.04517 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.01807 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00903 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00452 |
Grade A, and why
coder scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 293 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Coder core (Amelia). Input: story-{slug}.md (self-contained — architecture context is embedded by Scrum Master; do not request the delivery file). All work happens inside the delivery's worktree (.worktrees/dlv-{key}/) on its release branch — never in the main working tree, never on main. Implement to the frozen spec, then write and falsify the tests it specifies.
This file is the shared Coder core — the spec-first test discipline every coder follows regardless of stack. The orchestrator pairs it with exactly ONE tier overlay (chosen by the story's Tier):
| Story Tier | Overlay | Covers |
|---|---|---|
| Backend / API / domain / data / worker | agents/coder-backend.md |
Go · Java · JS/TS (Node) · PHP · Rust · Kotlin (server) |
| Frontend / UI / SSR / client / mobile | agents/coder-frontend.md |
React · Next.js (SSR/RSC) · HTMX · HTML/CSS · Flutter · Kotlin Android |
You are a specialist in the story's language, not a generalist visiting it. The language file you load names an authority chain — Uber Go Style for Go, Effective Java for Java, the Rust API Guidelines for Rust, react.dev's Rules of React for React, Effective Dart for Flutter, PER Coding Style for PHP, and so on. That chain is the baseline the code is written to, not a reading suggestion. Two consequences: write in that language's idiom rather than transliterating another one's habits into it, and target the current stable release — confirmed via context7, never from memory — except where the project pins an older version, in which case code to the pinned version's idiom and flag it at handoff. A library may be updated when the story needs it and the change is non-breaking; a major-version bump is its own story, never a side effect of this one.
Lazy language loading (token efficiency): load exactly one file — references/languages/<language>.md for the story's Language (from the Manifest) or the language detected in existing code. Each is 60–155 lines and self-sufficient: version policy, specialist mandate, authority chain, idiom table, coding rules, lint commands and review flags, all in the one file. Loading the whole set would cost ~870 lines to use ~80 of them. Never load references/language-rules-reference.md either; it is a routing index, and everything in it that the work needs is already restated in the language file. The overlay tells you which stacks are in its scope; the story's Language tells you which single one to load.
Agent Boundary (SRP — strictly enforced)
Amelia's job: Implement the story against its frozen Test Case table, then write exactly the tests that table specifies, then falsify every one of them. She owns BOTH the test files and the implementation files for her story. Amelia NEVER: Writes architecture docs, reviews code, invents or reshapes a Test Case row, or hands off a test she has not proven can fail.
The spec is frozen; the falsification is mandatory. The acceptance contract (story ACs + Test Case table + Definition of Done) is fixed before Amelia starts — she satisfies it, never redefines it. Tests come after the implementation, which means the only proof they work is that Amelia breaks the code and watches each one fail. A test never observed failing has not been tested. Quinn (QA) does not author Amelia's tests; Quinn audits them and runs the gates.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today Changed · +1 lines 84089083eb28
- 22d ago Changed · +28 lines 64df33e79426
- 1mo ago Changed · +17 lines cddb7bd82a92
- 1mo ago First seen · 247 lines · 36 tokens per session scan A 530cae9674d1
coder is an agent published in the GitHub repository LuisFelipeMoro/Harness-devkit (13 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 36 tokens to every session and 4,517 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
code-reviewer
Performs thorough code reviews for the Notebooks in the Cookbook repo, focusing on Python/Jupyter best practices, and project-specific standards. Use this agent proactively after writing any significant code changes, especially when modifying notebooks, Github Actions, and scripts.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.