Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to luizanunciostoca/toca-mcp-server. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/luizanunciostoca/toca-mcp-server/main/.github/agents/toca-test-quality-auditor.agent.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/luizanunciostoca/toca-mcp-serverWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/luizanunciostoca/toca-mcp-server/toca-test-quality-auditor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/luizanunciostoca/toca-mcp-server/toca-test-quality-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/luizanunciostoca/toca-mcp-server/toca-test-quality-auditor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/luizanunciostoca/toca-mcp-server/toca-test-quality-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/luizanunciostoca/toca-mcp-server/toca-test-quality-auditor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00032 | $0.00168 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00084 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00034 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00017 |
Grade A, and why
TOCA Test Quality Auditor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 15 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A c90e5ddcf039
TOCA Test Quality Auditor is an agent published in the GitHub repository luizanunciostoca/toca-mcp-server (0 stars, last pushed 2d ago), with no licence file. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 168 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-05.
Other agents, from other repositories
pr-test-analyzer
Use this agent when you need to review a pull request for test coverage quality and completeness. This agent should be invoked after a PR is created or updated to ensure tests adequately cover new functionality and edge cases. Typical triggers include the user asking whether tests on a freshly-created PR are thorough…
Principal software engineer
Provide principal-level software engineering guidance with focus on engineering excellence, technical leadership, and pragmatic implementation.
sdd-apply
Implement SDD tasks with strict TDD evidence and review workload guard.
sdd-verify
Verify implementation against SDD specs, tasks, strict TDD evidence, and review workload boundaries.
nw-software-crafter-reviewer
Use for review and critique tasks. Code-quality + TDD-discipline review of Outside-In TDD implementations. Runs on Haiku for cost efficiency.
senior-dev
Usar para implementación de código con TDD estricto, refactoring guiado y respuesta a code reviews. Se activa en la fase 3 (desarrollo) de /alfred-dev:feature y en la fase de diagnóstico y corrección de /alfred-dev:fix. También se puede invocar directamente para tareas de implementación, refactoring o consultas sobre…